Authority Audit · powered by Essentras

Come appare Vellum online?

Authority Audit, ultimo controllo: 14 ott 2026.

Authority Audit · Vellum

45/100
Emergente Report pronto

Jesse Tunnicliff and Vellum lack foundational online authority, with no search rankings for the name, minimal media coverage from non-tier-1 outlets, and absence from Wikipedia and major social platforms. Immediate priority should be establishing verifiable media presence and a Wikipedia page with credible sourcing to build baseline credibility across AI systems and search engines.

RicercaStampaIAWikipediaRecensioniProfili
5
lacune rilevate
1
risultati rapidi
6/6
verifiche eseguite

Interventi prioritari

In ordine di impatto sul punteggio. Ognuno rimanda direttamente al servizio che lo risolve.

1
Creazione di pagine Wikipedia$4,000, garanzia soddisfatti o rimborsati

Establish a neutral, well-sourced Wikipedia page, backed by a money-back guarantee.

Risolvi
2
Programma di PR digitaleSu misura

Feed the models the authoritative, structured coverage they cite, so they describe you accurately.

Risolvi
3
Pubblicazioni su testate Tier-1da $250

Push recognizable, indexable coverage onto your first page.

Risolvi
4
Google Knowledge Panelda $650

Establish a Google Knowledge Panel so your verified facts show beside your name in search.

Risolvi
5
Rivendicazione di username premiumda $15,000

Claim and lock a clean, consistent handle across the platforms that matter.

Risolvi

L'analisi completa

Presenza nei motori di ricerca57
Da migliorareNothing authoritative ranks for your name.
  • No overtly negative results on your first page.
  • Of the top 10: 2 owned/professional, 0 tier-1 press, 0 reference sources, 3 social, 0 thin or syndicated.
  • Nothing recognizable or encyclopedic ranks for your name, so a searcher has no way to verify who you are.
Pubblicazioni su testate Tier-1
Stampa e media95
SolidaCovered by 10 outlets, none tier-1.
  • Found 10 distinct outlets covering you.
  • You have coverage, but none of it is in the tier-1 outlets buyers and journalists recognize.
Visibilità nella IA12
VulnerabileChatGPT: no reliable info · Claude: no reliable info
  • ChatGPT: no reliable info. ChatGPT claims no reliable information available.
  • Claude: no reliable info. Claude claims no reliable information available.
  • When AI cannot describe you accurately, every buyer who asks it about you hears silence or worse.
ChatGPTClaude
Programma di PR digitale
Wikipedia10
VulnerabileNo Wikipedia page found.
  • No Wikipedia article matches you. Wikipedia is the single biggest input to the Google Knowledge Panel and to what AI assistants state as fact about you.
Creazione di pagine Wikipedia
Reputazione e recensioni-
Non applicabileNo public review profile found for Vellum.
  • No Google Business Profile or Trustpilot page is indexed for Vellum. There are no reviews to clean up, so this is neutral, not a gap.
Username e social48
Da migliorareOn 1 of 4 core platforms.
  • Discoverable on Instagram.
  • Missing or not discoverable on TikTok, YouTube, X.
Instagram
Rivendicazione di username premium

Come è stato misurato

  • Risultati della prima pagina di Google e Knowledge Panel tramite una scansione SERP in tempo reale.
  • Wikipedia tramite l'API REST ufficiale di Wikipedia.
  • Visibilità nell'IA chiedendo a ChatGPT e Claude, gli assistenti che le persone usano davvero, chi sei.
  • Reputazione tramite valutazione su Google, presenza su Trustpilot e risultati con sentiment negativo.
  • Coerenza degli username su Instagram, TikTok, YouTube e X a partire dai profili indicizzati.

Esegui il tuo audit gratuito su essentras.com/tools/authority-audit.