Free tool · powered by Essentras
Will AI cite erdsolutions.ie?
AI Visibility Score, last checked 15 Aug 2026.
Minimal third-party mentions and zero entity clarity severely limit AI citation; page is a feature-list shell with no original content.
Very unlikely to be cited by any generative engine. The brand has no Knowledge Panel, no Wikipedia presence, and only six third-party mentions (mostly social profiles and domain variants), while the homepage is a repetitive list of internal admin features with zero original data, insights, or extractable answers that AI models could reference.
Entity authority
How much AI already trusts you across the web — the biggest driver of citations, and the hardest to DIY.
Six distinct third-party domains mention the brand, but most are owned domain variants (erdsolutions.biz, .net), social profiles (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn), or a single directory listing (Tracxn)—no independent press, reviews, or editorial coverage.
Fix: Earn mentions in industry publications, client case studies on third-party sites, guest articles, podcast appearances, or reviews on independent platforms to build share of voice.
Get tier-1 press placements · from $250 →No Google Knowledge Panel exists, and the brand lacks consistent entity signals across the web; the page itself is a generic feature list with no clear identity or value proposition.
Fix: Establish a Wikidata entry, ensure consistent NAP (name, address, phone) across directories, claim and optimize Google Business Profile, and create a clear About page explaining who you are and what you do.
Get a Google Knowledge Panel · from $650 →No Wikipedia page found, and the brand does not appear in reference corpora that AI models heavily cite.
Fix: Wikipedia requires independent notability (significant press coverage); focus first on earning third-party editorial mentions, then consider a Wikipedia entry if coverage threshold is met.
Get a Wikipedia page · $4,000, money-back →On-page extractability
How easily AI can read, understand, and quote this specific page.
The page is entirely a repetitive list of internal admin features with no original data, statistics, case studies, client quotes, research, or unique insights—nothing an AI could cite as a source.
Fix: Publish original research, client success metrics, industry benchmarks, expert commentary, or detailed how-to guides with data not found elsewhere.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →Content is a flat, repetitive list of page names with identical boilerplate descriptions; no answer-first paragraphs, no clear headings addressing user questions, no tables or meaningful lists.
Fix: Restructure the homepage with clear sections answering specific questions (What do you do? Who do you serve? What results do you deliver?), use descriptive headings, and add tables or bullet lists for key features or benefits.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →No publication or update dates are visible anywhere on the page.
Fix: Add visible last-updated dates to the page footer or content sections, and refresh content regularly to signal currency.
No AI crawlers are blocked in robots.txt, the page is server-rendered with 1200 words visible to bots, and the site is indexed.
Basic Organization and WebSite schema present, plus a minimal FAQ schema with one generic question; no named author, no credentials, no detailed organizational markup.
Fix: Add author schema with real names and credentials, expand FAQ schema with substantive questions and answers, and include organizational details like founding date, location, and contact information in schema.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →What to fix, ranked by impact
Highest-leverage first. Purple/green = Essentras can do it for you; grey = a do-it-yourself win.
Being named on independent, trusted publications is the strongest correlate of AI citation — it beats backlinks and domain authority. This is the #1 lever.
Three tier-1 outlets AI engines already read and cite — the fastest way to build the third-party mentions AI weighs most.
A Knowledge Panel is how Google and AI Overviews confirm you are a real entity worth citing.
Wikipedia is ~48% of ChatGPT’s cited sources. With no page, AI has no canonical reference to cite about you.
A professional, AI-indexed article about you on a real outlet — the fastest, cheapest way to give assistants something concrete to quote.
Information gain is the top causal on-page lever (+22-41% in controlled tests). Add a stat, benchmark, or quote no other page has — restating consensus barely helps.
Lead each section with a 1-3 sentence direct answer, then a list or real table. One heading = one question. AI can only cite what it can cleanly extract.
AI-cited content is ~26% fresher on average; Perplexity leans hardest on recency. Refresh commercial pages every 60-90 days with a genuine last-updated date.
Don’t waste time on
- ✕Obsessing over schema / JSON-LD. Controlled before/after tests show it has no causal lift on AI citations. Keep it for normal Google rich results, but do not over-invest expecting AI to cite you because of it.
- ✕Adding an llms.txt file. AI crawlers do not read it (Google confirmed; ~0.1% of AI-bot requests hit it). It is speculative, not a ranking factor.
- ✕Chasing word count. Correlation between length and AI citation is ~0.04 (basically none). Originality and structure beat length every time.
How to fix this fast
AI barely sees you. The fastest fix is a citation on a source it already trusts.
We write and publish a professional article about you on a real, AI-cited outlet, indexed by Google and citeable by ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Get your first placement for $9.99.
Other sites we checked
Check any URL free at essentras.com/tools/ai-visibility-score.