Free tool · powered by Essentras

Will AI cite erdsolutions.ie?

AI Visibility Score, last checked 15 Aug 2026.

AI Visibility Score
20/100

Minimal third-party mentions and zero entity clarity severely limit AI citation; page is a feature-list shell with no original content.

17/100
Entity authority
23/100
On-page

Very unlikely to be cited by any generative engine. The brand has no Knowledge Panel, no Wikipedia presence, and only six third-party mentions (mostly social profiles and domain variants), while the homepage is a repetitive list of internal admin features with zero original data, insights, or extractable answers that AI models could reference.

Entity authority

How much AI already trusts you across the web — the biggest driver of citations, and the hardest to DIY.

Brand mentions & press (share of voice)
28/100

Six distinct third-party domains mention the brand, but most are owned domain variants (erdsolutions.biz, .net), social profiles (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn), or a single directory listing (Tracxn)—no independent press, reviews, or editorial coverage.

Fix: Earn mentions in industry publications, client case studies on third-party sites, guest articles, podcast appearances, or reviews on independent platforms to build share of voice.

Get tier-1 press placements · from $250
Knowledge Panel & entity clarity
15/100

No Google Knowledge Panel exists, and the brand lacks consistent entity signals across the web; the page itself is a generic feature list with no clear identity or value proposition.

Fix: Establish a Wikidata entry, ensure consistent NAP (name, address, phone) across directories, claim and optimize Google Business Profile, and create a clear About page explaining who you are and what you do.

Get a Google Knowledge Panel · from $650
Wikipedia & reference-corpus presence
0/100

No Wikipedia page found, and the brand does not appear in reference corpora that AI models heavily cite.

Fix: Wikipedia requires independent notability (significant press coverage); focus first on earning third-party editorial mentions, then consider a Wikipedia entry if coverage threshold is met.

Get a Wikipedia page · $4,000, money-back

On-page extractability

How easily AI can read, understand, and quote this specific page.

Information gain (original data & quotes)
5/100

The page is entirely a repetitive list of internal admin features with no original data, statistics, case studies, client quotes, research, or unique insights—nothing an AI could cite as a source.

Fix: Publish original research, client success metrics, industry benchmarks, expert commentary, or detailed how-to guides with data not found elsewhere.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro
Extractable structure (answer-first, lists, tables)
12/100

Content is a flat, repetitive list of page names with identical boilerplate descriptions; no answer-first paragraphs, no clear headings addressing user questions, no tables or meaningful lists.

Fix: Restructure the homepage with clear sections answering specific questions (What do you do? Who do you serve? What results do you deliver?), use descriptive headings, and add tables or bullet lists for key features or benefits.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro
Freshness
0/100

No publication or update dates are visible anywhere on the page.

Fix: Add visible last-updated dates to the page footer or content sections, and refresh content regularly to signal currency.

Technical eligibility (crawlable, AI bots allowed)
85/100

No AI crawlers are blocked in robots.txt, the page is server-rendered with 1200 words visible to bots, and the site is indexed.

Schema & on-page E-E-A-T
40/100

Basic Organization and WebSite schema present, plus a minimal FAQ schema with one generic question; no named author, no credentials, no detailed organizational markup.

Fix: Add author schema with real names and credentials, expand FAQ schema with substantive questions and answers, and include organizational details like founding date, location, and contact information in schema.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro

What to fix, ranked by impact

Highest-leverage first. Purple/green = Essentras can do it for you; grey = a do-it-yourself win.

Tier-1 press placementsfrom $250

Being named on independent, trusted publications is the strongest correlate of AI citation — it beats backlinks and domain authority. This is the #1 lever.

Fix this →
Business Insider / Yahoo / AP News bundle$840 (was $1,860)

Three tier-1 outlets AI engines already read and cite — the fastest way to build the third-party mentions AI weighs most.

Fix this →
Google Knowledge Panelfrom $650

A Knowledge Panel is how Google and AI Overviews confirm you are a real entity worth citing.

Fix this →
Wikipedia page creation$4,000, money-back

Wikipedia is ~48% of ChatGPT’s cited sources. With no page, AI has no canonical reference to cite about you.

Fix this →
MarketSpy placement ($9.99 intro)$9.99

A professional, AI-indexed article about you on a real outlet — the fastest, cheapest way to give assistants something concrete to quote.

Fix this →
Add original data or a direct quoteDIY

Information gain is the top causal on-page lever (+22-41% in controlled tests). Add a stat, benchmark, or quote no other page has — restating consensus barely helps.

Make it answer-first and extractableDIY

Lead each section with a 1-3 sentence direct answer, then a list or real table. One heading = one question. AI can only cite what it can cleanly extract.

Show a real, recent update dateDIY

AI-cited content is ~26% fresher on average; Perplexity leans hardest on recency. Refresh commercial pages every 60-90 days with a genuine last-updated date.

Don’t waste time on

  • Obsessing over schema / JSON-LD. Controlled before/after tests show it has no causal lift on AI citations. Keep it for normal Google rich results, but do not over-invest expecting AI to cite you because of it.
  • Adding an llms.txt file. AI crawlers do not read it (Google confirmed; ~0.1% of AI-bot requests hit it). It is speculative, not a ranking factor.
  • Chasing word count. Correlation between length and AI citation is ~0.04 (basically none). Originality and structure beat length every time.

How to fix this fast

AI barely sees you. The fastest fix is a citation on a source it already trusts.

We write and publish a professional article about you on a real, AI-cited outlet, indexed by Google and citeable by ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Get your first placement for $9.99.

Check any URL free at essentras.com/tools/ai-visibility-score.