Free tool · powered by Essentras
Will AI cite marketspy.com?
AI Visibility Score, last checked 2 Sept 2026.
Blocked all major AI crawlers in robots.txt — invisible to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews despite decent brand presence.
Currently near-zero citation likelihood across all major generative engines because robots.txt explicitly blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, and CCBot — the crawlers that feed ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Even with six distinct third-party domains naming MarketSpy (Yahoo Finance, Crunchbase, TradingView, Chrome Web Store, GitHub, and a .net variant), the technical block means engines cannot access or index this content for future citation.
Entity authority
How much AI already trusts you across the web — the biggest driver of citations, and the hardest to DIY.
Six distinct third-party domains name MarketSpy including Yahoo Finance, Crunchbase, TradingView, Chrome Web Store, and GitHub — moderate breadth indicating established presence but not dominant share of voice.
Fix: Pursue editorial coverage in industry-specific manufacturing, AI, or SME business publications to broaden third-party mentions beyond tech directories and financial platforms.
Get tier-1 press placements · from $250 →No Google Knowledge Panel found and entity identity is somewhat fragmented — multiple similarly-named properties (MarketSpy trading system, Chrome extension, GitHub projects) create disambiguation challenges.
Fix: Establish consistent brand identity across all properties, consider Wikidata entry with clear disambiguation, and build structured citations linking MarketSpy.com to its specific focus on market intelligence and news.
Get a Google Knowledge Panel · from $650 →No Wikipedia page exists for MarketSpy, eliminating access to the single strongest corpus source for AI citation (roughly 48 percent of ChatGPT's cited sources).
Fix: Meet Wikipedia notability guidelines through sustained coverage in independent reliable sources, then create a properly sourced article — this is the highest-leverage long-term move for AI citation.
Get a Wikipedia page · $4,000, money-back →On-page extractability
How easily AI can read, understand, and quote this specific page.
Article contains original reporting including specific award details (Flare 2026 joint first place, 1500 pounds from ESBF), named advisory board members, direct institutional partnerships, and a quote from Inshira on joining IDAIC — substantive information gain not widely replicated.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →Clear subheadings and answer-first opening paragraph, but many sections are narrative prose without extractable lists, tables, or explicit question-answer pairs that engines prefer.
Fix: Reformat key sections into bulleted lists (advisory board members, partnerships, awards) and add explicit question-style subheadings like 'What problem does Inshira solve?' to improve extractability.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →Article explicitly dated September 1, 2026, with multiple time-stamped references (July Climate Intelligence Forum, Flare 2026 award) — strong recency signals.
Robots.txt explicitly blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, and CCBot — this page is invisible to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews regardless of content quality.
Fix: Remove AI crawler blocks from robots.txt immediately — this is the single most critical fix, as current configuration makes all other optimization irrelevant for generative engine citation.
No JSON-LD structured data present, article byline shows 'Augusta Parker' but no author credentials or organizational markup to establish expertise signals.
Fix: Add Article schema with author, date published, and publisher organization; include author bio with credentials if available — though this has minimal causal effect on AI citation, it supports general discoverability.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →What to fix, ranked by impact
Highest-leverage first. Purple/green = Essentras can do it for you; grey = a do-it-yourself win.
robots.txt currently blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, CCBot — those engines cannot see you at all. Remove the Disallow for them.
Being named on independent, trusted publications is the strongest correlate of AI citation — it beats backlinks and domain authority. This is the #1 lever.
Three tier-1 outlets AI engines already read and cite — the fastest way to build the third-party mentions AI weighs most.
A Knowledge Panel is how Google and AI Overviews confirm you are a real entity worth citing.
Wikipedia is ~48% of ChatGPT’s cited sources. With no page, AI has no canonical reference to cite about you.
A professional, AI-indexed article about you on a real outlet — the fastest, cheapest way to give assistants something concrete to quote.
Information gain is the top causal on-page lever (+22-41% in controlled tests). Add a stat, benchmark, or quote no other page has — restating consensus barely helps.
Lead each section with a 1-3 sentence direct answer, then a list or real table. One heading = one question. AI can only cite what it can cleanly extract.
Don’t waste time on
- ✕Obsessing over schema / JSON-LD. Controlled before/after tests show it has no causal lift on AI citations. Keep it for normal Google rich results, but do not over-invest expecting AI to cite you because of it.
- ✕Adding an llms.txt file. AI crawlers do not read it (Google confirmed; ~0.1% of AI-bot requests hit it). It is speculative, not a ranking factor.
- ✕Chasing word count. Correlation between length and AI citation is ~0.04 (basically none). Originality and structure beat length every time.
How to fix this fast
AI barely sees you. The fastest fix is a citation on a source it already trusts.
We write and publish a professional article about you on a real, AI-cited outlet, indexed by Google and citeable by ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Get your first placement for $9.99.
Other sites we checked
Check any URL free at essentras.com/tools/ai-visibility-score.