Free tool · powered by Essentras

Will AI cite marketspy.com?

AI Visibility Score, last checked 2 Sept 2026.

AI Visibility Score
42/100

Blocked all major AI crawlers in robots.txt — invisible to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews despite decent brand presence.

33/100
Entity authority
53/100
On-page

Currently near-zero citation likelihood across all major generative engines because robots.txt explicitly blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, and CCBot — the crawlers that feed ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Even with six distinct third-party domains naming MarketSpy (Yahoo Finance, Crunchbase, TradingView, Chrome Web Store, GitHub, and a .net variant), the technical block means engines cannot access or index this content for future citation.

Entity authority

How much AI already trusts you across the web — the biggest driver of citations, and the hardest to DIY.

Brand mentions & press (share of voice)
52/100

Six distinct third-party domains name MarketSpy including Yahoo Finance, Crunchbase, TradingView, Chrome Web Store, and GitHub — moderate breadth indicating established presence but not dominant share of voice.

Fix: Pursue editorial coverage in industry-specific manufacturing, AI, or SME business publications to broaden third-party mentions beyond tech directories and financial platforms.

Get tier-1 press placements · from $250
Knowledge Panel & entity clarity
35/100

No Google Knowledge Panel found and entity identity is somewhat fragmented — multiple similarly-named properties (MarketSpy trading system, Chrome extension, GitHub projects) create disambiguation challenges.

Fix: Establish consistent brand identity across all properties, consider Wikidata entry with clear disambiguation, and build structured citations linking MarketSpy.com to its specific focus on market intelligence and news.

Get a Google Knowledge Panel · from $650
Wikipedia & reference-corpus presence
0/100

No Wikipedia page exists for MarketSpy, eliminating access to the single strongest corpus source for AI citation (roughly 48 percent of ChatGPT's cited sources).

Fix: Meet Wikipedia notability guidelines through sustained coverage in independent reliable sources, then create a properly sourced article — this is the highest-leverage long-term move for AI citation.

Get a Wikipedia page · $4,000, money-back

On-page extractability

How easily AI can read, understand, and quote this specific page.

Information gain (original data & quotes)
68/100

Article contains original reporting including specific award details (Flare 2026 joint first place, 1500 pounds from ESBF), named advisory board members, direct institutional partnerships, and a quote from Inshira on joining IDAIC — substantive information gain not widely replicated.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro
Extractable structure (answer-first, lists, tables)
58/100

Clear subheadings and answer-first opening paragraph, but many sections are narrative prose without extractable lists, tables, or explicit question-answer pairs that engines prefer.

Fix: Reformat key sections into bulleted lists (advisory board members, partnerships, awards) and add explicit question-style subheadings like 'What problem does Inshira solve?' to improve extractability.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro
Freshness
95/100

Article explicitly dated September 1, 2026, with multiple time-stamped references (July Climate Intelligence Forum, Flare 2026 award) — strong recency signals.

Technical eligibility (crawlable, AI bots allowed)
5/100

Robots.txt explicitly blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, and CCBot — this page is invisible to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews regardless of content quality.

Fix: Remove AI crawler blocks from robots.txt immediately — this is the single most critical fix, as current configuration makes all other optimization irrelevant for generative engine citation.

Schema & on-page E-E-A-T
22/100

No JSON-LD structured data present, article byline shows 'Augusta Parker' but no author credentials or organizational markup to establish expertise signals.

Fix: Add Article schema with author, date published, and publisher organization; include author bio with credentials if available — though this has minimal causal effect on AI citation, it supports general discoverability.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro

What to fix, ranked by impact

Highest-leverage first. Purple/green = Essentras can do it for you; grey = a do-it-yourself win.

Unblock AI crawlers in robots.txtDIY

robots.txt currently blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, CCBot — those engines cannot see you at all. Remove the Disallow for them.

Tier-1 press placementsfrom $250

Being named on independent, trusted publications is the strongest correlate of AI citation — it beats backlinks and domain authority. This is the #1 lever.

Fix this →
Business Insider / Yahoo / AP News bundle$840 (was $1,860)

Three tier-1 outlets AI engines already read and cite — the fastest way to build the third-party mentions AI weighs most.

Fix this →
Google Knowledge Panelfrom $650

A Knowledge Panel is how Google and AI Overviews confirm you are a real entity worth citing.

Fix this →
Wikipedia page creation$4,000, money-back

Wikipedia is ~48% of ChatGPT’s cited sources. With no page, AI has no canonical reference to cite about you.

Fix this →
MarketSpy placement ($9.99 intro)$9.99

A professional, AI-indexed article about you on a real outlet — the fastest, cheapest way to give assistants something concrete to quote.

Fix this →
Add original data or a direct quoteDIY

Information gain is the top causal on-page lever (+22-41% in controlled tests). Add a stat, benchmark, or quote no other page has — restating consensus barely helps.

Make it answer-first and extractableDIY

Lead each section with a 1-3 sentence direct answer, then a list or real table. One heading = one question. AI can only cite what it can cleanly extract.

Don’t waste time on

  • Obsessing over schema / JSON-LD. Controlled before/after tests show it has no causal lift on AI citations. Keep it for normal Google rich results, but do not over-invest expecting AI to cite you because of it.
  • Adding an llms.txt file. AI crawlers do not read it (Google confirmed; ~0.1% of AI-bot requests hit it). It is speculative, not a ranking factor.
  • Chasing word count. Correlation between length and AI citation is ~0.04 (basically none). Originality and structure beat length every time.

How to fix this fast

AI barely sees you. The fastest fix is a citation on a source it already trusts.

We write and publish a professional article about you on a real, AI-cited outlet, indexed by Google and citeable by ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Get your first placement for $9.99.

Check any URL free at essentras.com/tools/ai-visibility-score.