Free tool · powered by Essentras
Will AI cite myrecoverysupport.com?
AI Visibility Score, last checked 24 Sept 2026.
Pre-launch app with modest third-party mentions; needs Wikipedia, press coverage, and original recovery data to earn AI citations.
Low citation likelihood across all engines until launch and broader press adoption. Eight third-party mentions (including Healthline, YouTube, Facebook) establish minimal entity presence, but no Knowledge Panel, no Wikipedia, and pre-launch status mean engines lack the reference-corpus depth and real-world validation needed to cite confidently.
Entity authority
How much AI already trusts you across the web, the biggest driver of citations, and the hardest to DIY.
Eight distinct third-party domains name My Recovery Support, including Healthline, YouTube, Facebook, and niche community sites, establishing baseline entity recognition.
Fix: Pursue editorial coverage in addiction-recovery trade publications, mental health media, and app-review outlets to broaden third-party mentions beyond social platforms and personal-story features.
Get tier-1 press placements · from $250 →No Google Knowledge Panel found and branded search does not return the official domain in top three results, indicating weak entity resolution.
Fix: After launch, build consistent citations (app-store listings, press mentions, directory profiles) using identical name and founder attribution to help Google establish a Knowledge Panel.
Get a Google Knowledge Panel · from $650 →No Wikipedia page exists for My Recovery Support, excluding it from the single strongest reference corpus for ChatGPT and other engines.
Fix: Wikipedia requires independent, secondary-source coverage; focus first on earning press in notable publications, then consider whether notability guidelines are met for a future article.
Get a Wikipedia page · $4,000, money-back →On-page extractability
How easily AI can read, understand, and quote this specific page.
Page describes app features and workflows in detail but offers no original recovery statistics, user-outcome data, clinical research, or expert quotes unavailable elsewhere.
Fix: Publish original data post-launch: anonymized user check-in trends, urge-pattern insights, retention statistics, or expert commentary from the founder's recovery-design experience.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →Clear answer-first FAQ section, descriptive headings, and feature lists with short explanatory paragraphs make content extractable, though some sections are image-heavy.
Fix: Ensure all feature descriptions and coach-example dialogues remain in HTML text (not image overlays) so engines can parse the full recovery-workflow detail.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →Copyright footer shows 2026, signaling recent attention, but no article publish dates, update timestamps, or blog posts demonstrate ongoing content refresh.
Fix: Add a blog or news section with dated posts (launch updates, recovery tips, feature announcements) and display last-updated timestamps on key pages.
Server-rendered HTML with no AI crawler blocks detected in robots.txt, ensuring full visibility to GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and Perplexity crawlers.
Organization, Website, Mobile Application, and FAQ Page schema present with named founder (Shawn Mettler), providing structured entity and authorship signals.
What to fix, ranked by impact
Highest-leverage first. Purple/green = Essentras can do it for you; grey = a do-it-yourself win.
Being named on independent, trusted publications is the strongest correlate of AI citation. It beats backlinks and domain authority. This is the #1 lever.
Three tier-1 outlets AI engines already read and cite. The fastest way to build the third-party mentions AI weighs most.
A Knowledge Panel is how Google and AI Overviews confirm you are a real entity worth citing.
Wikipedia is ~48% of ChatGPT’s cited sources. With no page, AI has no canonical reference to cite about you.
A professional, AI-indexed article about you on a real outlet. The fastest, cheapest way to give assistants something concrete to quote.
Information gain is the top causal on-page lever (+22-41% in controlled tests). Add a stat, benchmark, or quote no other page has. Restating consensus barely helps.
Lead each section with a 1-3 sentence direct answer, then a list or real table. One heading = one question. AI can only cite what it can cleanly extract.
AI-cited content is ~26% fresher on average; Perplexity leans hardest on recency. Refresh commercial pages every 60-90 days with a genuine last-updated date.
Don’t waste time on
- ✕Obsessing over schema / JSON-LD. Controlled before/after tests show it has no causal lift on AI citations. Keep it for normal Google rich results, but do not over-invest expecting AI to cite you because of it.
- ✕Adding an llms.txt file. AI crawlers do not read it (Google confirmed; ~0.1% of AI-bot requests hit it). It is speculative, not a ranking factor.
- ✕Chasing word count. Correlation between length and AI citation is ~0.04 (basically none). Originality and structure beat length every time.
How to fix this fast
AI barely sees you. The fastest fix is a citation on a source it already trusts.
We write and publish a professional article about you on a real, AI-cited outlet, indexed by Google and citeable by ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Get your first placement for $9.99.
A score is a prediction. This is the receipt.
You now know if AI could cite you.
Want to know if it does?
The score above reads your page and predicts. The check does the opposite: it finds the questions your buyers actually type, using Google’s own search-volume data, puts them to 5 live AI models with the web open, and shows you the answer word for word.
Your name highlighted if it is in there. The competitors it named instead if it is not.
Run the free AI checkFree. No account, no card. About a minute.
somebody asks an AI: best crm for a small sales team
- 1HubSpot
- 2Pipedrive
- 3Salesforce
- 4Zoho CRM
your company?
A real answer from a real check. Names as the model returned them.
This scored one page. The full baseline scores your whole category.
We ask 50 buying questions about what you sell to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and DeepSeek, then send you who got named instead of you, and why. $97, back in 2 business days.
Other sites we checked
Check any URL free at essentras.com/tools/ai-visibility-score.