Free tool · powered by Essentras
Will AI cite thehouseofjoshi.com?
AI Visibility Score, last checked 23 Aug 2026.
Niche Web3 brand with social presence but zero reference-corpus footprint and no original data to cite.
Extremely unlikely to be cited by any generative engine. The brand exists only in social media and blockchain explorers—not in Wikipedia, press, or reference corpora that ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity draw from. The homepage offers zero original statistics, research, or quotable insights that would warrant citation.
Entity authority
How much AI already trusts you across the web — the biggest driver of citations, and the hardest to DIY.
Seven distinct third-party domains name the brand, but all are social platforms (Instagram, Threads, YouTube, X) or blockchain explorers—no editorial press, reviews, or independent articles.
Fix: Earn coverage in crypto news outlets, Web3 publications, or industry comparison articles to build reference-corpus presence beyond social media.
Get tier-1 press placements · from $250 →No Google Knowledge Panel and no consistent entity signals beyond social profiles; the brand lacks the structured identity markers that help AI engines resolve it as a trusted entity.
Fix: Build consistent brand mentions across independent editorial sources and consider Wikidata entry if notability criteria are met.
Get a Google Knowledge Panel · from $650 →No Wikipedia page and no presence in the reference corpora that large language models primarily cite from.
Fix: Focus first on earning press coverage and third-party editorial mentions; Wikipedia requires independent notability and cannot be self-created.
Get a Wikipedia page · $4,000, money-back →On-page extractability
How easily AI can read, understand, and quote this specific page.
The page contains only marketing copy and generic blockchain buzzwords—no original data, statistics, research findings, or expert quotes that engines could cite.
Fix: Publish original research, ecosystem metrics, user statistics, or founder interviews with quotable insights that provide unique information not found elsewhere.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →Headings exist but are purely promotional; no answer-first paragraphs, no question-based structure, no lists or tables with extractable facts.
Fix: Add a frequently asked questions section, create comparison tables of supported chains, or structure content to answer specific queries about the ecosystem.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →No publication dates, update timestamps, or temporal signals anywhere on the page.
Fix: Add visible last-updated dates to content sections and publish timestamped announcements or ecosystem updates.
No AI crawler blocks detected in robots.txt and the page is server-rendered and indexable.
No JSON-LD structured data present and no named authors or credentials visible on the page.
Fix: Add Organization schema with founding details and consider author attribution for any published content or research.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →What to fix, ranked by impact
Highest-leverage first. Purple/green = Essentras can do it for you; grey = a do-it-yourself win.
Being named on independent, trusted publications is the strongest correlate of AI citation — it beats backlinks and domain authority. This is the #1 lever.
Three tier-1 outlets AI engines already read and cite — the fastest way to build the third-party mentions AI weighs most.
A Knowledge Panel is how Google and AI Overviews confirm you are a real entity worth citing.
Wikipedia is ~48% of ChatGPT’s cited sources. With no page, AI has no canonical reference to cite about you.
A professional, AI-indexed article about you on a real outlet — the fastest, cheapest way to give assistants something concrete to quote.
Information gain is the top causal on-page lever (+22-41% in controlled tests). Add a stat, benchmark, or quote no other page has — restating consensus barely helps.
Lead each section with a 1-3 sentence direct answer, then a list or real table. One heading = one question. AI can only cite what it can cleanly extract.
AI-cited content is ~26% fresher on average; Perplexity leans hardest on recency. Refresh commercial pages every 60-90 days with a genuine last-updated date.
Don’t waste time on
- ✕Obsessing over schema / JSON-LD. Controlled before/after tests show it has no causal lift on AI citations. Keep it for normal Google rich results, but do not over-invest expecting AI to cite you because of it.
- ✕Adding an llms.txt file. AI crawlers do not read it (Google confirmed; ~0.1% of AI-bot requests hit it). It is speculative, not a ranking factor.
- ✕Chasing word count. Correlation between length and AI citation is ~0.04 (basically none). Originality and structure beat length every time.
How to fix this fast
AI barely sees you. The fastest fix is a citation on a source it already trusts.
We write and publish a professional article about you on a real, AI-cited outlet, indexed by Google and citeable by ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Get your first placement for $9.99.
Other sites we checked
Check any URL free at essentras.com/tools/ai-visibility-score.