Free tool · powered by Essentras

Will AI cite gm-med.co.uk?

AI Visibility Score, last checked 5 Sept 2026.

AI Visibility Score
28/100

Invisible to AI: zero genuine third-party brand mentions, blocked AI crawlers, and no entity recognition despite solid on-page structure.

8/100
Entity authority
52/100
On-page

Extremely unlikely to be cited by any generative engine. The brand has no third-party mentions (all 17 search results are unrelated entities: General Motors, GM Med Spa, leather products, academic papers), no Knowledge Panel, blocks CCBot (a major AI crawler), and lacks Wikipedia or press presence. Even with good on-page structure, AI models have no external signal that this brand exists.

Entity authority

How much AI already trusts you across the web — the biggest driver of citations, and the hardest to DIY.

Brand mentions & press (share of voice)
8/100

Zero genuine third-party mentions found — all 17 results are unrelated entities (General Motors, GM Med Spa, leather products, academic papers) with no connection to this UK medical supplier.

Fix: Earn editorial mentions on healthcare industry sites, medical procurement blogs, or local business press; consider press releases for new product lines or partnerships to build third-party visibility.

Get tier-1 press placements · from $250
Knowledge Panel & entity clarity
15/100

No Google Knowledge Panel and no recognizable entity footprint; the brand is invisible to entity-resolution systems despite having a Companies House registration and social profiles.

Fix: Build consistent citations across healthcare directories, industry associations, and local business listings; ensure name-address-phone consistency to help Google establish entity identity.

Get a Google Knowledge Panel · from $650
Wikipedia & reference-corpus presence
0/100

No Wikipedia page; the Wikipedia match found is for General Motors (completely unrelated automotive company), providing zero reference-corpus signal for this medical supplier.

Fix: Wikipedia is earned, not created — focus first on building press mentions and industry recognition; consider contributing expertise to relevant medical supply or procurement articles if notable enough.

Get a Wikipedia page · $4,000, money-back

On-page extractability

How easily AI can read, understand, and quote this specific page.

Information gain (original data & quotes)
35/100

Page contains some original positioning (15 years expertise, CIPS credentials, specific supplier partnerships) but lacks unique data, original research, or quotable statistics not found elsewhere.

Fix: Publish original procurement data, industry surveys, or case studies with specific outcomes; add expert commentary or statistics about UK medical supply trends to create cite-worthy content.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro
Extractable structure (answer-first, lists, tables)
72/100

Strong extractable structure with clear headings, product lists, feature bullets, and answer-first sections; content is well-organized for machine parsing despite being server-rendered.

Freshness
65/100

One dated content piece visible (27 August 2026 spotlight article) shows some freshness signals, though homepage itself lacks explicit update timestamps.

Fix: Add last-updated dates to key pages and product categories; maintain a regular cadence of dated blog posts or product spotlights to signal ongoing freshness.

Technical eligibility (crawlable, AI bots allowed)
25/100

Blocks CCBot in robots.txt, making the site invisible to Common Crawl-dependent AI systems; server-rendered content is otherwise accessible, but this is a critical visibility gap.

Fix: Remove CCBot block from robots.txt immediately — Common Crawl feeds many AI training corpora and citation systems; verify GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot are also allowed.

Schema & on-page E-E-A-T
68/100

Comprehensive Medical Organization schema with legal identifiers, contact details, and social profiles; duplicate Organization and WebSite schemas present but well-formed.

Fix: Add named author schema to blog and spotlight articles; consider adding review or rating schema if customer testimonials exist to strengthen trust signals.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro

What to fix, ranked by impact

Highest-leverage first. Purple/green = Essentras can do it for you; grey = a do-it-yourself win.

Unblock AI crawlers in robots.txtDIY

robots.txt currently blocks CCBot — those engines cannot see you at all. Remove the Disallow for them.

Tier-1 press placementsfrom $250

Being named on independent, trusted publications is the strongest correlate of AI citation — it beats backlinks and domain authority. This is the #1 lever.

Fix this →
Business Insider / Yahoo / AP News bundle$840 (was $1,860)

Three tier-1 outlets AI engines already read and cite — the fastest way to build the third-party mentions AI weighs most.

Fix this →
Google Knowledge Panelfrom $650

A Knowledge Panel is how Google and AI Overviews confirm you are a real entity worth citing.

Fix this →
Wikipedia page creation$4,000, money-back

Wikipedia is ~48% of ChatGPT’s cited sources. With no page, AI has no canonical reference to cite about you.

Fix this →
MarketSpy placement ($9.99 intro)$9.99

A professional, AI-indexed article about you on a real outlet — the fastest, cheapest way to give assistants something concrete to quote.

Fix this →
Add original data or a direct quoteDIY

Information gain is the top causal on-page lever (+22-41% in controlled tests). Add a stat, benchmark, or quote no other page has — restating consensus barely helps.

Don’t waste time on

  • Obsessing over schema / JSON-LD. Controlled before/after tests show it has no causal lift on AI citations. Keep it for normal Google rich results, but do not over-invest expecting AI to cite you because of it.
  • Adding an llms.txt file. AI crawlers do not read it (Google confirmed; ~0.1% of AI-bot requests hit it). It is speculative, not a ranking factor.
  • Chasing word count. Correlation between length and AI citation is ~0.04 (basically none). Originality and structure beat length every time.

How to fix this fast

AI barely sees you. The fastest fix is a citation on a source it already trusts.

We write and publish a professional article about you on a real, AI-cited outlet, indexed by Google and citeable by ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Get your first placement for $9.99.

Check any URL free at essentras.com/tools/ai-visibility-score.