Free tool · powered by Essentras

Will AI cite hockettcleaning.co.uk?

AI Visibility Score, last checked Sep 26, 2026.

AI Visibility Score
29/100

Local Bristol cleaning service with minimal third-party mentions and all major AI crawlers blocked in robots.txt.

20/100
Entity authority
39/100
On-page

Extremely unlikely to be cited by any generative AI engine. All major AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Perplexity, Google-Extended) are blocked in robots.txt, making the site invisible to their training and retrieval systems. Even if crawlable, the brand lacks the independent web presence (no Knowledge Panel, no Wikipedia, minimal press) that drives AI citation.

Entity authority

How much AI already trusts you across the web. The biggest driver of citations, and the hardest to DIY.

Brand mentions & press (share of voice)
35/100

Seven distinct third-party domains mention the brand (LinkedIn, Nextdoor, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, two directory sites), indicating some local presence but no editorial press, review sites, or comparison articles.

Fix: Earn coverage in Bristol property blogs, local news outlets, tenant advice sites, and cleaning comparison platforms to build independent mentions that AI engines can discover and trust.

Get tier-1 press placements · from $250 →
Knowledge Panel & entity clarity
15/100

No Google Knowledge Panel found and the brand does not own its branded search results, indicating weak entity recognition in Google's knowledge graph.

Fix: Build consistent citations across major directories, claim and optimize Google Business Profile, and earn structured mentions in authoritative local and industry sources to establish entity clarity.

Get a Google Knowledge Panel · from $650 →
Wikipedia & reference-corpus presence
0/100

No Wikipedia page exists for this local cleaning service, which is expected for a regional business but limits presence in the reference corpus AI engines heavily rely on.

Get a Wikipedia page · $4,000, money-back →

On-page extractability

How easily AI can read, understand and quote this specific page.

Information gain (original data & quotes)
55/100

The page offers specific local insights about Bristol's hard water issues, property types by neighborhood, and a detailed 72-hour guarantee, providing some original information not found everywhere.

Fix: Publish original data such as deposit-return statistics, before-and-after case studies with specific results, or survey findings about Bristol tenant cleaning challenges to increase unique information value.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →
Extractable structure (answer-first, lists, tables)
65/100

Clear answer-first sections with descriptive headings, a structured FAQ, and step-by-step process explanation, though tables and lists could be more prominent for key service details.

Fix: Convert service features and guarantee terms into explicit bullet lists or comparison tables, and ensure each FAQ answer starts with a direct one-sentence response.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →
Freshness
20/100

No visible publication or update dates anywhere on the page, making it impossible for AI engines to assess content currency.

Fix: Add clear last-updated dates to the page footer or service sections, and regularly refresh content with current year references and recent customer counts to signal freshness.

Technical eligibility (crawlable, AI bots allowed)
5/100

Robots.txt explicitly blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, and CCBot, making the site completely invisible to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and most AI training systems.

Fix: Remove AI crawler blocks from robots.txt immediately to allow ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews to access and potentially cite your content.

Schema & on-page E-E-A-T
10/100

No JSON-LD structured data present, no named author or credentials visible, and no schema markup to help engines understand the business type, services, or reviews.

Fix: Add Local Business schema with service area, contact details, and aggregate rating if available; include named team member profiles with credentials to establish expertise signals.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →

What to fix, ranked by impact

Highest-leverage first. Purple and green: Essentras can do it for you. Grey: a do-it-yourself win.

Unblock AI crawlers in robots.txtDIY

robots.txt currently blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, CCBot. Those engines cannot see you at all. Remove the Disallow for them.

Tier-1 press placementsfrom $250

Being named on independent, trusted publications is the strongest correlate of AI citation. It beats backlinks and domain authority. This is the #1 lever.

Fix this →
Business Insider / Yahoo / AP News bundle$840 (was $1,860)

Three tier-1 outlets AI engines already read and cite. The fastest way to build the third-party mentions AI weighs most.

Fix this →
Google Knowledge Panelfrom $650

A Knowledge Panel is how Google and AI Overviews confirm you are a real entity worth citing.

Fix this →
Wikipedia page creation$4,000, money-back

Wikipedia is ~48% of ChatGPT’s cited sources. With no page, AI has no canonical reference to cite about you.

Fix this →
MarketSpy placement ($9.99 intro)$9.99

A professional, AI-indexed article about you on a real outlet. The fastest, cheapest way to give assistants something concrete to quote.

Fix this →
Add original data or a direct quoteDIY

Information gain is the top causal on-page lever (+22-41% in controlled tests). Add a stat, benchmark or quote no other page has. Restating consensus barely helps.

Make it answer-first and extractableDIY

Lead each section with a 1-3 sentence direct answer, then a list or real table. One heading = one question. AI can only cite what it can cleanly extract.

Show a real, recent update dateDIY

AI-cited content is ~26% fresher on average; Perplexity leans hardest on recency. Refresh commercial pages every 60-90 days with a genuine last-updated date.

Don’t waste time on

  • ✕Obsessing over schema / JSON-LD. Controlled before/after tests show it has no causal lift on AI citations. Keep it for normal Google rich results, but do not over-invest expecting AI to cite you because of it.
  • ✕Adding an llms.txt file. AI crawlers do not read it (Google confirmed; ~0.1% of AI-bot requests hit it). It is speculative, not a ranking factor.
  • ✕Chasing word count. Correlation between length and AI citation is ~0.04 (basically none). Originality and structure beat length every time.

How to fix this fast

AI barely sees you. The fastest fix is a citation on a source it already trusts.

We write and publish a professional article about you on a real, AI-cited outlet, indexed by Google and citable by ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Get your first placement for $9.99.

A score is a prediction. This is the receipt.

You now know if AI could cite you.
Want to know if it does?

The score above reads your page and predicts. The check does the opposite: it finds the questions your buyers actually type, using Google’s own search-volume data, puts them to 5 live AI models with the web open, and shows you the answer word for word.

Your name highlighted if it is in there. The competitors it named instead if it is not.

Run the free AI check

Free. No account, no card. About a minute.

somebody asks an AI: best crm for a small sales team

  1. 1HubSpot
  2. 2Pipedrive
  3. 3Salesforce
  4. 4Zoho CRM
5

your company?

A real answer from a real check. Names as the model returned them.

This scored one page. The full baseline scores your whole category.

We ask 50 buying questions about what you sell to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and DeepSeek, then send you who got named instead of you, and why. $97, back in 2 business days.

Check any URL free at essentras.com/tools/ai-visibility-score.