Free tool · powered by Essentras
Will AI cite curionx.com?
AI Visibility Score, last checked Oct 12, 2026.
Emerging B2B ad-tech brand with minimal third-party press and no Wikipedia or Knowledge Panel; needs earned media coverage.
Low likelihood of citation by any generative engine today. The brand has five social/directory mentions but lacks editorial press, Wikipedia, or a Knowledge Panel, so engines have no independent corpus to draw from when answering questions about programmatic advertising or curation.
Entity authority
How much AI already trusts you across the web. The biggest driver of citations, and the hardest to DIY.
Five third-party domains name Curionx, but all are social profiles or a single agency partner page, no editorial press or review sites.
Fix: Earn coverage in ad-tech trade publications like AdExchanger, Digiday, or The Drum; guest columns and case study placements build independent mentions that engines trust.
Get tier-1 press placements · from $250 →No Google Knowledge Panel and no consistent entity footprint beyond owned social channels; engines cannot resolve Curionx as a verified, authoritative entity.
Fix: Secure a Crunchbase profile, consistent NAP citations, and press mentions to help Google build a Knowledge Panel; consider a Wikipedia draft if notability criteria are met.
Get a Google Knowledge Panel · from $650 →No Wikipedia page exists for Curionx, removing the single strongest citation source for ChatGPT and other models.
Fix: If the company meets Wikipedia notability guidelines (significant independent press coverage), draft and submit a page; otherwise focus on earning that coverage first.
Get a Wikipedia page · $4,000, money-back →On-page extractability
How easily AI can read, understand and quote this specific page.
Page includes specific performance statistics (19% cost efficiency reduction, 25% CTR lift) and client quotes from Coca-Cola and Index Exchange, offering some original data.
Fix: Publish more proprietary research, benchmark reports, or named case studies with full data sets; link to downloadable whitepapers that other sites will cite.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →Headings are present and some sections use answer-first phrasing, but many blocks are marketing prose without clear question-answer pairs or tables.
Fix: Rewrite key sections as explicit questions (e.g., 'What is audience curation?') with one-paragraph answers first, then add comparison tables for services and performance metrics.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →Footer shows copyright 2025 but no article dates, last-updated timestamps, or blog post dates visible on the homepage.
Fix: Add visible 'Last updated' dates to service pages and publish timestamped blog posts regularly; engines reward recency signals when they can see them.
Server-rendered HTML with 909 words visible to crawlers, no AI bots blocked in robots.txt, and the site is indexed.
No JSON-LD schema detected and no named authors or credentials visible on the page.
Fix: Add Organization schema with logo and social links, and name authors on blog posts with short bios; low-weight signal but easy to implement.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →What to fix, ranked by impact
Highest-leverage first. Purple and green: Essentras can do it for you. Grey: a do-it-yourself win.
Being named on independent, trusted publications is the strongest correlate of AI citation. It beats backlinks and domain authority. This is the #1 lever.
Three tier-1 outlets AI engines already read and cite. The fastest way to build the third-party mentions AI weighs most.
A Knowledge Panel is how Google and AI Overviews confirm you are a real entity worth citing.
Wikipedia is ~48% of ChatGPT’s cited sources. With no page, AI has no canonical reference to cite about you.
A professional, AI-indexed article about you on a real outlet. The fastest, cheapest way to give assistants something concrete to quote.
Information gain is the top causal on-page lever (+22-41% in controlled tests). Add a stat, benchmark or quote no other page has. Restating consensus barely helps.
Lead each section with a 1-3 sentence direct answer, then a list or real table. One heading = one question. AI can only cite what it can cleanly extract.
AI-cited content is ~26% fresher on average; Perplexity leans hardest on recency. Refresh commercial pages every 60-90 days with a genuine last-updated date.
Don’t waste time on
- ✕Obsessing over schema / JSON-LD. Controlled before/after tests show it has no causal lift on AI citations. Keep it for normal Google rich results, but do not over-invest expecting AI to cite you because of it.
- ✕Adding an llms.txt file. AI crawlers do not read it (Google confirmed; ~0.1% of AI-bot requests hit it). It is speculative, not a ranking factor.
- ✕Chasing word count. Correlation between length and AI citation is ~0.04 (basically none). Originality and structure beat length every time.
How to fix this fast
AI barely sees you. The fastest fix is a citation on a source it already trusts.
We write and publish a professional article about you on a real, AI-cited outlet, indexed by Google and citable by ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Get your first placement for $9.99.
A score is a prediction. This is the receipt.
You now know if AI could cite you.
Want to know if it does?
The score above reads your page and predicts. The check does the opposite: it finds the questions your buyers actually type, using Google’s own search-volume data, puts them to 6 live AI models with the web open, and shows you the answer word for word.
Your name highlighted if it is in there. The competitors it named instead if it is not.
Run the free AI checkFree. No account, no card. About a minute.
somebody asks an AI: best crm for a small sales team
- 1HubSpot
- 2Pipedrive
- 3Salesforce
- 4Zoho CRM
your company?
A real answer from a real check. Names as the model returned them.
This scored one page. The full baseline scores your whole category.
We ask 50 buying questions about what you sell to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, DeepSeek and Grok, then send you who got named instead of you, and why. $97, back in 2 business days.
Other sites we checked
Check any URL free at essentras.com/tools/ai-visibility-score.