Last updated · reviewed by the Essentras editorial team
journalist request platforms and PR software / Alternatives
The 14 Best Featured (formerly Terkel) Alternatives and Competitors (2026)
Essentras Editorial Team/Reviewed 4 Oct 2026/63 vendor pricing pages checked/How we compared
Qwoted, Muck Rack, Connectively and HARO are the names most often set against Featured, plus Essentras for buyers who want a confirmed placement instead of another pitch queue. The real split is pitching volume against a guaranteed result: subscription tools sell access to compete for coverage, Essentras sells the placement itself, at a stated price.
Per placement, with each outlet's price published before you order
Published
Buyers who need one nameable article on a known outlet by a known date, rather than a pitching pipeline to run indefinitely.
Featured (formerly Terkel)
$0/mo
Mixed
Independent PR practitioners, in-house marketers, and small agencies who want an ongoing, self-serve pitching workflow across journalist requests (HARO/Connectively), podcasts, and bylines, with AI help drafting and prioritizing responses.
PR professionals, in-house marketers, and individual subject-matter experts who want recurring, high-volume access to inbound journalist requests to pitch into, rather than a single guaranteed media placement.
Independent experts, solo consultants, and small PR/SEO teams who want an ongoing, low-cost DIY channel to answer live journalist/publisher queries and occasionally earn a press mention, rather than buying one specific guaranteed placement.
In-house comms/PR teams and agencies that pitch media continuously across many stories or clients and want an ongoing database, pitching workflow and coverage-monitoring tool, rather than a single purchased placement.
In-house PR teams or agencies that need an ongoing journalist database, AI-assisted pitching, and media monitoring at volume, not a buyer who wants one specific, named placement.
Enterprise or agency comms teams that need an always-on media monitoring, journalist-outreach and reporting operation running all year, not a single verified placement.
Public companies, IR/compliance teams, and large enterprises that need regulated financial-disclosure-grade wire distribution (AP and financial-terminal feeds) and can absorb a quote-only, membership-gated pricing process.
Solo founders, authors, and small businesses with time to pitch daily who want free or low-cost (sub-$30/mo) exposure across many earned-media formats, and who don't need a guaranteed single outlet or URL.
Large PR/communications teams and agencies that need continuous, enterprise-scale media and social monitoring across many brands, markets, and languages, not a single placement.
Individual experts, consultants, and small-business owners with spare time to personally monitor and reply to a shared inbox of reporter queries, who want free shots at top-tier earned media and can accept zero guarantee of placement, outlet, or timing.
PR/communications teams that want to run their own ongoing press outreach and maintain a permanent branded newsroom, rather than buy a single placement
Mid-market and agency PR/communications teams that want one subscription covering media-contact search, pitch outreach, and cross-channel (news/broadcast/social/podcast) monitoring, and that are comfortable negotiating a quote and an annual contract with a sales team rather than buying off a published price list.
Agencies and in-house marketers who want a single productized vendor to order backlinks, press releases, PR mentions, and "AI visibility" services a la carte or via a monthly managed-SEO retainer, without vetting individual publishers themselves.
Published list pricing, checked 4 October 2026 on each vendor's own site. Vendors change pricing and add-ons without notice, and quote-only vendors negotiate per deal, so confirm at the source before you buy. Anything we could not verify is marked, not estimated.
Why buyers look past Featured
01Every paid tier, including Pro+ at up to $299 a month, is metered by a daily AI-usage allowance rather than by placements or outcomes, so a buyer pays for pitching capacity, not a result.
02The cheapest rate requires a full year prepaid, and Featured's own terms state fees already paid are not refundable, with cancellations taking effect only at the next billing cycle.
03High competition is a recurring complaint: many subscribers pitch the same request and typically only one is selected, illustrated by a Trustpilot reviewer who reported just 1 of 48 answered questions being chosen.
04Mandatory LinkedIn verification to act as a source is a recurring Trustpilot complaint, reviewers say it excludes credentialed professionals, among them doctors and teachers, who do not keep a LinkedIn profile.
05There is no stated policy on whether a resulting link is dofollow or nofollow, and no choice of which outlet or journalist ultimately uses a pitch.
06Some publisher domains that do pick up an answer get as few as roughly 100 monthly visits despite a high domain-authority score, reviewers note, so even a win can carry little traffic.
Before you move. Upgrades apply immediately; downgrades or cancellations apply only at the next billing-cycle boundary, so an annual subscriber who wants to leave mid-term keeps the higher tier (and has already paid non-refundable annual fees) until that prepaid year runs out. No published data-export or portability policy was found on the vendor's site.
The 14 best Featured (formerly Terkel) alternatives, in full
Each entry carries what it costs, what the money buys, where it falls short, and the buyer it is right for. Published list pricing, checked 4 October 2026 on each vendor's own site. Vendors change pricing and add-ons without notice, and quote-only vendors negotiate per deal, so confirm at the source before you buy. Anything we could not verify is marked, not estimated.
1.
Essentras
A catalogue of named publications, each showing its own price, turnaround and link policy before purchase.
PricePer placement, with each outlet's price published before you orderBest forBuyers who need one nameable article on a known outlet by a known date, rather than a pitching pipeline to run indefinitely.
Pros
Each outlet shows its own price, turnaround and dofollow or nofollow policy before payment, so the comparison happens before money moves rather than after.
The deliverable is a confirmed live URL on the publication you chose, not a pitch submitted into a shared queue a publisher may never open.
No subscription, no seat count and no minimum: one placement is a valid order, and there is no notice period or renewal date to diarise.
Cons
We are not a software product: no dashboard, no media database, no monitoring and no alerts, so a team that needs daily PR tooling still needs one of these platforms.
A placement bought from us is a paid placement, not a journalist's independent editorial pick, and we state that rather than presenting it as earned press.
We are smaller than the platform vendors: there is no seat model, no SSO, no procurement portal and no dedicated account manager on a standard order.
Verdict. Buy here when the deliverable has to be a specific URL on a specific outlet by a specific date. Keep a subscription when the job is ongoing pitching, monitoring or a media database, because those are not what we sell.
An AI-assisted PR platform ("your co-pilot for PR") that surfaces journalist, podcast, byline, speaking, and award opportunities for users to pitch themselves; owns and operates HARO and Connectively.
Price$0/mo to $29-79/moBest forIndependent PR practitioners, in-house marketers, and small agencies who want an ongoing, self-serve pitching workflow across journalist requests (HARO/Connectively), podcasts, and bylines, with AI help drafting and prioritizing responses.
On the pricing: $0/mo (Free, forever); cheapest paid tier is Lite at $29/mo billed annually ($348/yr), or $39/mo billed monthly $29-79/mo billed annually ($348-$948/yr) covers most solo/individual buyers (Lite is marked "Most Popular"); agencies needing max throughput land on Pro+ at $239/mo billed annually ($2,868/yr)
Free
$0/mo
Free forever. Same feature set as paid tiers (Featured Chat, journalist-request matching, core outreach tools) but the lowest daily AI-usage allowance, example usage: 2-3 opportunities/week.
Lite (Most Popular)
$29/mo billed annually at $348/yr, or $39/mo billed monthly
5x the Free daily AI usage. For solo practitioners: workflows across saved opportunities, deeper AI chat, higher weekly pitching limits.
Pro
$79/mo billed annually at $948/yr, or $99/mo billed monthly
5x Lite's usage (25x Free). For power users running a full PR operation: maximum daily allowance, built for teams.
Pros
One subscription unlocks the full feature set at every paid tier, Featured Chat, journalist-request matching (HARO/Connectively/LinkedIn), podcast and bylined-article discovery, speaking/awards opportunities, media monitoring, and AI-search (GEO) visibility tracking, tiers differ only by daily AI-usage allowance, not by which tools are gated.
Direct, software-mediated access to the HARO/Connectively inbound-request pipeline that Featured itself now owns and operates (per Featured's own figures: 150,000+ registered sources and 75,000+ journalists/bloggers on HARO alone), rather than relying on a separate, disconnected tool.
Team plans (Team Lite/Pro/Pro+, $199-$1,499/mo) include up to 25 member logins at one flat fee with no per-seat charge, a shared usage pool, and an admin dashboard, unusual in a category that typically charges per seat.
Cons
Every tier, including the top paid Pro+ plan, is metered by a daily AI-usage/credit allowance rather than by a number of placements or outcomes, the buyer is paying for pitching capacity, not a guaranteed result, and sustained high-volume use requires the $239-299/mo Pro+ tier.
List prices are structured around annual prepayment (the monthly-billed rate runs ~20-25% higher, e.g. Lite is $39/mo billed monthly vs. $29/mo if $348 is paid upfront for the year), and per Featured's own Terms all fees are non-refundable once charged, with cancellations/downgrades only taking effect at the next billing cycle.
There is no choice of which outlet, podcast, or journalist ultimately uses a pitch, no stated guarantee a given pitch gets selected, and no published policy on whether resulting links are nofollow or dofollow, the user wins a spot in a shared, competitive request pool rather than buying a named, confirmed placement.
Verdict. Choose Featured when independent PR practitioners, in-house marketers, and small agencies who want an ongoing, self-serve pitching workflow across journalist requests (HARO/Connectively), podcasts, and bylines, with AI help drafting and prioritizing responses..
A journalist-request marketplace: PR pros, marketers and individual experts pay for pitch volume to respond to live reporter queries, rather than buying a placement outright.
Price$149/moBest forPR professionals, in-house marketers, and individual subject-matter experts who want recurring, high-volume access to inbound journalist requests to pitch into, rather than a single guaranteed media placement.G24.4/5 (~20-23 reviews, per search listing of G2's reviews page; direct G2 fetch returned 403 so this is not independently re-verified on the raw page)
On the pricing: Free (Basic plan: 2 pitches/mo, 2-hour delay) $149/mo (Pro, month-to-month) or $99/mo if prepaid annually at $1,188/yr
Basic
$0/mo
2 pitches/month, 2-hour response delay before you can reply to a request, access to the reporter database, real-time alerts, daily opportunities email
Pro
$149/mo (or $99/mo billed annually at $1,188/yr, shown on-site as discounted from $1,788/yr)
35 pitches/month, no response delay, plus events & awards database, pitch intelligence, and opportunity research tools
Teams
Custom/enterprise pricing (contact sales)
Unlimited pitches, no delay, team management, white-labeling, admin dashboard, weekly activity reports, premium support & training
Pros
35 pitches/month with no response delay on Pro ($149/mo or $99/mo annual) versus just 2 pitches/month and a 2-hour delay on the free Basic tier, paying unlocks both volume and the ability to respond the moment a request posts.
Pro and Teams tiers add research tooling on top of the base marketplace: an events & awards database, "pitch intelligence," and opportunity research that free users don't get.
Ongoing access to a live database of inbound journalist requests across a large base of outlets, with real-time alerts and a daily opportunities digest, functioning as a continuous pipeline rather than a one-time transaction.
Cons
Pricing above Pro is quote-only: the Teams/enterprise tier (unlimited pitches, team seats, white-labeling, dedicated account manager) has no published price, so buyers must contact sales to learn the real cost of scaling past 35 pitches/month.
A subscription buys pitching access, not a guaranteed placement or outlet choice: you respond into open journalist requests alongside every other subscriber, with no assurance a reporter uses your pitch and no say over which publication or story it lands in.
Payments are final and non-refundable with no prorated refund on mid-cycle cancellation, and the lower $99/mo Pro rate requires prepaying a full year ($1,188) up front rather than paying $149/mo with the ability to cancel anytime.
Verdict. Qwoted is the pick for someone who wants a bigger paid pitch quota, 35 pitches a month with no response delay, at $149/mo (or $99/mo if a year is prepaid), as the most direct swap for Featured's own pitch-and-compete model.
part of Featured (Featured.com); legal operating entity is Terkel, Inc., dba Connectively / dba Featured
A journalist/publisher Q&A platform where subject-matter experts answer live media queries for a chance at press mentions; owned by Featured (Featured.com), which also owns HARO.
Price$0/moBest forIndependent experts, solo consultants, and small PR/SEO teams who want an ongoing, low-cost DIY channel to answer live journalist/publisher queries and occasionally earn a press mention, rather than buying one specific guaranteed placement.
On the pricing: $0/mo (Free plan: 3 answers + 1 bylined article/month); cheapest paid tier is Lite at $19/mo, or $11/mo if billed yearly
Free
$0/mo
3 answers/month, 1 bylined article/month, early access to HARO queries, Expert Profile Page, 3 daily keyword alerts, AI chat + email support
Everything in Lite, plus unlimited answers and bylined articles (abuse-guardrail capped), Link Type & Domain Authority visibility, PR Intelligence, 25 real-time keyword alerts, priority support, Connectively AI
Pros
A live, searchable feed of journalist and publisher queries - including early access to HARO's queries - that a paying member can answer as often as their plan allows, with Pro/Business offering unlimited answers and bylined-article submissions (subject to abuse guardrails).
Business-tier media discovery tooling: a searchable media database, AI-powered journalist recommendations, buildable/exportable media lists, and premium API access for running your own outreach.
Transparent, published month-to-month or discounted annual software pricing with no retainer, plus pay-as-you-go credits (credits never expire, no subscription required) for buyers who just want to try the channel cheaply before committing.
Cons
No guaranteed placement, outlet, or timing: Connectively's own Terms of Service state it does not warrant that "answers submitted by Panelists will be published and/or be published in a timely manner" - a submission goes into a shared query pool and the publisher alone decides whether, where, and when to use it.
Link type and Domain Authority visibility is itself a paid Pro-tier feature; nothing on the published pricing or terms pages commits to followed links, a minimum outlet DA, or any outlet selection for Free/Lite subscribers.
Annual ("billed yearly") pricing is prepaid and nonrefundable per the Terms of Service, with no credit for unused periods; paid plans auto-renew monthly and require 30 days' written cancellation notice, and Pro/Business team seats are billed per seat on top of the base plan.
Verdict. Connectively is the right choice for someone who wants early access to HARO's own queries plus unlimited answers from $29/mo billed yearly, accepting that its own terms state publication is never guaranteed.
A journalist-database, PR CRM, pitching and media-monitoring platform sold as an annual, seat-and-module software license, not a per-placement service.
PriceQuote onlyBest forIn-house comms/PR teams and agencies that pitch media continuously across many stories or clients and want an ongoing database, pitching workflow and coverage-monitoring tool, rather than a single purchased placement.G24.5/5 (500+ reviews)
Pros
A continuously maintained database of journalist profiles and verified media contacts spanning a large number of outlets, built for ongoing targeted outreach rather than a one-time placement.
One integrated workflow covering media-list building, pitching/CRM, press-release distribution to your own targeted lists, and coverage monitoring/reporting, instead of separate tools for each step.
Strong measured user satisfaction on core usability and contact freshness: rated 4.5/5 across 500+ verified reviews on G2.
Cons
No published pricing: Muck Rack's own pricing page states plainly that it does not list pricing publicly and that proposals are customized by user count and selected modules, so every buyer must go through a sales conversation before learning a number.
Annual-only contract: multiple independent buyer guides report there is no monthly plan, so a team must commit to a full year of spend before confirming fit, and G2-sourced commentary describes steep price increases at renewal.
Seat- and module-based licensing: Muck Rack's own FAQ confirms cost scales with user count and which add-on modules (e.g., advanced analytics, distribution) are selected, so price tracks platform access and team size rather than the number of media placements actually achieved.
Verdict. Muck Rack suits a comms team that pitches media continuously across many stories or clients and wants one platform combining a journalist database, CRM and coverage monitoring under an annual, quote-only licence, rather than a per-pitch subscription.
A media database, AI journalist-matching, and pitching/monitoring tool, absorbed into Semrush's product suite and sold under a Semrush account.
Price$149/mo to $279/moBest forIn-house PR teams or agencies that need an ongoing journalist database, AI-assisted pitching, and media monitoring at volume, not a buyer who wants one specific, named placement.
On the pricing: $149/mo (Base plan, billed annually) $279/mo (Pro plan, billed annually, the mid tier with monitoring and pitch-tracking most commercial PR users need)
Base
$149/mo billed annually
AI-cited media finder, global media database with AI search, AI journalist recommendations, media pitching tool, AI writing assistance, email analytics
Pro
$279/mo billed annually
Everything in Base, plus AI-assisted media monitoring, audience/traffic insight on outlets, contact exporting, follow-up scheduling, pitch-to-coverage tracking
Business
$499/mo billed annually
Everything in Pro, plus competitor media-presence tracking and coverage benchmarking, branded monitoring search groups, 50,000 monthly media mentions monitored
Pros
A real global media/journalist database with AI-driven journalist-matching and an AI writing/pitching assistant for building and sending outreach at scale
AI-assisted media monitoring plus (on Pro/Business) audience and traffic insight on individual outlets and pitch-to-coverage tracking, so results can be measured, not just sent
On Business, competitor media-presence tracking and coverage benchmarking against rivals, which standalone pitching tools rarely bundle in
Cons
Published list pricing is annual-only ($149-$499/mo, billed annually) with no monthly rate shown, and access now requires a Semrush account rather than a standalone Prowly login
Per Prowly's own Billing Policy, subscriptions auto-renew and all fees paid are non-cancellable and non-refundable, with cancellation only taking effect at the end of the current paid term
It is a pitching and database tool, not a placement guarantee: no outlet or result is assured at any tier, monitoring volume is capped (e.g. 50,000 mentions/month on Business), and additional seats cost extra ($20/mo/user)
Verdict. Prowly, now sold as the Semrush AI PR Toolkit, fits a team already paying for Semrush's other tools that wants AI-matched pitching and monitoring billed annually from $149/mo, alongside its existing SEO suite.
part of Platinum Equity (private equity; took Cision private from public shareholders in a Jan 2020 public-to-private deal, confirmed on platinumequity.com/portfolio/cision)
The parent platform behind PR Newswire and PRWeb, media database, monitoring, journalist outreach, and comms analytics sold as a quote-only annual subscription.
PriceQuote onlyBest forEnterprise or agency comms teams that need an always-on media monitoring, journalist-outreach and reporting operation running all year, not a single verified placement.G23.9 (2,387 reviews, Cision's aggregate G2 seller listing, g2.com/sellers/cision)
Pros
A large proprietary media/journalist contact database with search and list-building across print, online, broadcast and social, reviewers on Capterra and TrustRadius repeatedly call it one of the deepest contact databases in the category.
One account spans monitoring + distribution (PR Newswire/PRWeb) + analytics + social listening (Brandwatch), with an assigned account manager and onboarding/training included.
Customizable, executive-ready reporting dashboards that reviewers specifically credit for helping prove PR ROI to leadership and boards.
Cons
No published pricing at any tier anywhere on cision.com or on third-party pricing databases (TrustRadius, Capterra), every plan requires a sales call before a buyer sees a number.
Per Cision's own Master Subscription Agreement, fees are invoiced annually in advance and are non-cancellable and non-refundable unless an individual Order says otherwise; multiple 2025-2026 reviews additionally describe an auto-renewal clause that re-bills a full year unless cancelled in writing well ahead of term-end.
Distribution runs through PR Newswire/PRWeb's wire network rather than letting a buyer pick named individual publications per release, and, per common industry practice on major newswires, the resulting links are typically nofollow/sponsored rather than a guaranteed dofollow placement chosen outlet-by-outlet.
Verdict. Cision is the choice for an enterprise or agency comms department that needs a year-round media database, monitoring and reporting bundle with a dedicated account manager, under a quote-only annual contract, not a single confirmed placement.
Tier-1 global newswire for press release distribution, owned by Cision; pricing is quote-only.
PriceQuote onlyBest forPublic companies, IR/compliance teams, and large enterprises that need regulated financial-disclosure-grade wire distribution (AP and financial-terminal feeds) and can absorb a quote-only, membership-gated pricing process.
Pros
Genuine tier-1 wire infrastructure, direct feeds into the Associated Press and major financial/media terminals that most lower-cost wires don't reach, which matters for regulated financial disclosures.
Editorial review staffed by (per their own site) editors averaging 12+ years' experience, with 24/7/365 support for coordinating embargoed or time-sensitive releases.
Granular circuit targeting, by country (170+), language (40+), state/region/city, industry, vertical and beat, so a release can be aimed at a specific newsroom segment rather than blasted everywhere.
Cons
Publishes no price anywhere on its own site: prnewswire.com/pr-distribution-and-placement/ states only that "costs vary" and routes every visitor to a "Request a Demo" contact form, the only way to learn a number is to hand a salesperson your contact details.
Sells reach into a geographic/industry/beat circuit, not a specific named publication, their own FAQ describes targeting by country, region, industry and beat, with no mechanism to choose or verify which individual outlet carries the release.
Requires a separate annual membership ($99 to $249/year per their own Terms & Conditions) before any release can be distributed, layered on top of the quoted per-release fee, with the Service Term auto-renewing and increasing 5% by default unless the client cancels with 90 days' written notice.
Verdict. PR Newswire is the right call specifically for regulated financial disclosure, an earnings release or similar material news, where direct AP and financial-terminal reach matters more than choosing a named outlet.
part of Featured (legal name Terkel, Inc., a Delaware corporation d/b/a Featured). Featured acquired HARO from Cision in April 2025 and also owns Connectively.
A free, 3x-daily email of journalist queries, now owned and operated by Featured ("the AI co-pilot for PR"), which upsells into its paid Connectively platform.
Price$0Best forSolo founders, authors, and small businesses with time to pitch daily who want free or low-cost (sub-$30/mo) exposure across many earned-media formats, and who don't need a guaranteed single outlet or URL.G24.9/5 (5 reviews, under the "Featured.com" G2 listing, reviews dated 2023, when the product was still branded Terkel, predating the HARO acquisition)
On the pricing: $0, HARO's email is free for both journalists and sources. The cheapest paid upsell is Connectively Lite at $11/mo billed yearly ($19/mo month-to-month). $0 for the core HARO digest, which is how most sources use it. Among buyers who upgrade, Featured's "Lite" tier ($29/mo billed annually at $348/yr) is marked "MOST POPULAR" on Featured's own pricing page.
HARO email (helpareporter.com)
$0
3x-daily digest of journalist queries by email, unlimited pitches, free for both journalists and sources, monetized by newsletter sponsorships, not user fees
Featured, Free
$0
Featured Chat for discovering media opportunities, daily pitching tools, journalist-request matching; a "gentle daily allowance" of AI/credit usage
Featured, Lite
$29/mo billed annually at $348/yr, or $39/mo month-to-month
5x the AI usage of Free; workflows across saved opportunities; deeper AI chat for drafting/research
Pros
Connectively (Featured's revived Q&A platform) surfaces HARO queries "the moment they go live", Featured's own page states "Featured owns and operates Help a Reporter Out. That means Connectively members see HARO queries the moment they go live, before the inbox floods," i.e. paying buys a speed edge over the free 3x-daily digest.
Paid tiers add keyword/topic alerts (up to 25, sent real-time on Connectively Pro, vs. 3/day on Free) and an AI drafting assistant (Featured Chat / Connectively AI) that cut the manual work of scanning three daily digests of roughly 40-100 queries each.
Featured's paid plans bundle reach well beyond HARO itself: journalist requests aggregated from Substack, X and LinkedIn, a stated database of 814,000 active podcasts, GEO/AI-visibility tracking, and bylined-article and speaking-opportunity discovery, opportunity types a $0 HARO signup doesn't include.
Cons
No guaranteed placement, outlet, or link type at any price: a HARO/Connectively response is a pitch competing with others for one journalist's pick, and if used, whether the resulting link is dofollow, nofollow, or a text-only credit is decided by the publication, not by the plan purchased.
Meaningful volume is gated behind paid tiers: Connectively's Free plan caps at 3 answers and 1 bylined article per month, and Featured's Free plan gives only "a gentle daily allowance" of AI usage, so a buyer who wants real throughput must move to a paid tier (from $11/mo on Connectively up to $1,199-$1,499/mo on Featured Team Pro+).
Team plans cap at 25 seats before requiring a custom Enterprise quote, and on Connectively's Pro/Business tiers, adding a seat is billed at the full per-seat rate (confirmed live: one extra Business seat raised the bill from $99 to $198/mo at month-to-month billing) rather than a volume discount.
Verdict. HARO is the better buy for anyone with time to pitch daily and no placement budget: the core digest is free and reaches a stated 150,000+ registered sources and 75,000+ journalists.
Enterprise media monitoring, social listening, and media-database platform sold through custom annual contracts rather than published pricing.
PriceQuote onlyBest forLarge PR/communications teams and agencies that need continuous, enterprise-scale media and social monitoring across many brands, markets, and languages, not a single placement.
Pros
A real-time media and social intelligence platform covering global news, broadcast, and social conversation, with sentiment and analytics layered on top (Media Intelligence + Social Listening).
A large searchable journalist/outlet database plus press distribution and PR reporting tools for building media lists and measuring coverage (Media Database + Media Relations + Press Distribution + PR Reporting).
Enterprise-grade capabilities at the higher tiers: API/MCP integrations, custom dashboards, and governance/permissions controls built for multi-brand or multi-client (agency) management.
Cons
Pricing is entirely quote-only: Meltwater's own pricing page states it uses "tailored pricing rather than a one-size-fits-all list" and every plan (Starter, Pro, Enterprise, Agency) routes to "Contact Sales", no buyer can see a real number before talking to sales.
Contracts carry a published 12-month minimum term and auto-renew for another full term of the same length unless either side gives written notice of non-renewal at least 60 days before expiration; once invoiced, payment obligations are non-cancellable and fees are non-refundable (Meltwater General Terms and Conditions, Meltwater News US Inc., eff. April 5, 2025).
The product is a monitoring, listening, and outreach platform, not a placement: it helps a team find journalists and track coverage, but it does not guarantee that any specific outlet will publish anything, the outcome still depends entirely on the customer's own pitch.
Verdict. Meltwater fits a large PR or communications team that needs continuous, enterprise-scale media and social monitoring across many brands and markets, with pitching as one module inside a wider, quote-only annual platform.
Peter Shankman's free email digest connecting expert sources directly to journalist queries, a solo-run relaunch of the original, pre-monetization HARO format.
PriceFree ($0) to $0Best forIndividual experts, consultants, and small-business owners with spare time to personally monitor and reply to a shared inbox of reporter queries, who want free shots at top-tier earned media and can accept zero guarantee of placement, outlet, or timing.
On the pricing: Free ($0), no paid plan exists at any tier
Source of Sources (SOS)
$0
Up to 3x/day email digest of journalist queries sent to every signed-up expert; reply directly to the reporter yourself; no paid tier, no seats, no contract
Pros
Genuinely free at every tier: full access to the journalist-query digest with no card on file, no seat limits, and no paid upgrade path to ever hit (confirmed on the vendor's own homepage: "This list doesn't cost a dime").
Reach into a stated base of 20,000+ journalists, broadcasters, bloggers and brands, with the homepage naming outlets such as the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post, Forbes, NPR and BBC as having sourced through it.
Fast cadence: reporter queries are posted "usually within a few hours" of submission across up to three mailings a day, with a dedicated "Urgent" track for reporters on same-day deadlines, so sources see requests while they're still live.
Cons
No guaranteed placement, outlet, or URL: a reply goes to exactly one journalist's personal inbox, and whether, or where, it's ever quoted depends entirely on that reporter's own judgment; the product supplies access to queries, not confirmed coverage.
No topic or industry filter: the expert sign-up form collects only name, email, and a daily-digest opt-in (confirmed on the site), so every subscriber gets the same undifferentiated firehose of up to three emails a day regardless of their field, rather than a filtered feed by category.
No published service guarantee: the list is run personally by one individual as a donation-funded side project, with no listed support channel, SLA, or continuity commitment, and removal for an off-topic reply is explicitly stated to be final with "no exceptions, no appeals."
Verdict. Source of Sources suits an expert with time to personally monitor a shared inbox of reporter queries who wants a genuinely free shot at top-tier outlets, with no guarantee, filter or paid tier at any level.
Branded online newsroom plus a media-contact CRM for pitching journalists and tracking coverage.
Price€100/mo to €250/moBest forPR/communications teams that want to run their own ongoing press outreach and maintain a permanent branded newsroom, rather than buy a single placement
On the pricing: €100/mo (billed annually; €150/mo if billed monthly) €250/mo billed annually (the "Standard" plan, marked as Prezly's most popular tier)
Essential
€100/mo billed annually (€150/mo billed monthly)
1 site/newsroom, 1 user, up to 5,000 contacts, unlimited stories, full analytics, Prezly branding on the newsroom
Standard
€250/mo billed annually (€300/mo billed monthly)
1 site, 2 users, up to 10,000 contacts, white-label newsroom, localization/auto-translation, custom domain emails
A branded, white-label (Standard+) online newsroom with full analytics that you own and can keep publishing to indefinitely, not a one-off page.
Built-in media-contact CRM with pitch tracking (opens, clicks, replies) and coverage logging in one dashboard, replacing a spreadsheet-plus-email workflow.
Transparent, published self-serve pricing with a genuine 14-day free trial (no credit card, no sales call required) to start on Essential or Standard.
Cons
Pricing is published only for Essential and Standard; Enterprise is quote-only ('Contact sales') with no public numbers for larger teams or contact volumes.
Annual plans auto-renew by default, require 30 days' written cancellation notice, and are non-refundable even if you cancel partway through the term.
Seat and contact caps are strict per tier: Essential is capped at 1 user and 5,000 contacts, Standard at 2 users and 10,000 contacts, so a growing team must upgrade or move to custom Enterprise pricing.
Verdict. Prezly is the right fit for a team that wants to own a branded newsroom and media-contact CRM for continuous outreach, published from €100/mo billed annually, rather than buy a single placement.
An all-in-one media database, pitching/CRM workflow, and cross-channel media + social monitoring platform for PR and comms teams, layered with an AI assistant called PR CoPilot.
PriceQuote onlyBest forMid-market and agency PR/communications teams that want one subscription covering media-contact search, pitch outreach, and cross-channel (news/broadcast/social/podcast) monitoring, and that are comfortable negotiating a quote and an annual contract with a sales team rather than buying off a published price list.
Pros
A large, searchable global media-contact database paired with an outreach/CRM workflow ("Agility Outreach") for building lists, sending pitches, and tracking who opened/replied.
Cross-channel monitoring and social listening in one place: news, broadcast, social, and podcast mentions, with sentiment analysis, real-time alerts, and scheduled/automated coverage reports.
An AI layer (PR CoPilot) for drafting pitches and surfacing relevant journalists, plus a dedicated account/support team, the single thing reviewers most consistently praise on both Capterra and TrustRadius.
Cons
Pricing is quote-only: agilitypr.com/pricing 404s, and the live plan pages (Agility Outreach, Monitoring, Enterprise, Social Listening, Newswire) show feature lists with no dollar figures, every call to action leads to a sales form or demo booking.
The standard contract auto-renews for a full additional year unless the customer cancels at least 90 days ahead of the renewal date, with an 8% fee increase built into every renewal term (per Agility's own Terms and Conditions).
The product is a contact database plus a pitching/monitoring toolkit, not a placement guarantee, it gives you the tools and the audience to reach journalists, but whether, where, and when any story actually runs is still up to an individual reporter, with no specific outlet or confirmed URL sold up front.
Verdict. Agility PR Solutions suits a mid-market or agency comms team that wants one quote-only annual subscription covering a media database, pitching workflow and cross-channel monitoring together, rather than a single purchased placement.
A Florida-based productized SEO shop selling per-unit link/PR/content products at published flat prices alongside budget-tiered managed-SEO retainers, with outlets chosen by HOTH (by Domain Rating bracket) rather than by the buyer.
Price$150 to $150-$450Best forAgencies and in-house marketers who want a single productized vendor to order backlinks, press releases, PR mentions, and "AI visibility" services a la carte or via a monthly managed-SEO retainer, without vetting individual publishers themselves.G2~4.3/5 (46 reviews, per search snippet of G2 listing; G2 page itself returned 403 on direct fetch)
On the pricing: $150 (Link Outreach or Press Release, each a flat one-time per-unit price) Highly variable by product: one-time link/PR orders commonly $150-$450; monthly retainers commonly $1,000-$10,000/mo depending on the managed-SEO tier or specialty service chosen.
Link Outreach
$150
One-time DR-bracketed link placement; outlet picked by HOTH, revealed after publication
Link Insertions
$200
One-time insertion of your link into an existing relevant article on a site HOTH sources
Platinum Links
$375
One-time higher-tier link placement
Pros
Transparent published per-unit list prices for discrete link/PR products (Link Outreach, Link Insertions, Platinum Links, Press Release, Exclusive Media Links) that a buyer can see and compare before ordering, unlike many link-building competitors that are fully quote-only.
A single vendor covers a wide span of the funnel, from one-off $150 link orders up through $5,000/mo AI-visibility retainers and $10,000/mo managed-SEO, so a buyer can consolidate spend with one account manager instead of juggling several vendors.
Large published review volume (272 Trustpilot reviews, 4.5/5 TrustScore as of 2026-10-04) gives buyers a bigger public track record to diligence than most boutique link-building shops.
Cons
Outlet is not chosen by the buyer: link products are sold by Domain Rating bracket (e.g. DR 20+/30+/40+/50+) and the specific publisher is only revealed after the piece is live, so there is no named-outlet selection before you pay.
Managed-SEO retainers are sold as four fixed monthly budget tiers ($1,000/$2,500/$5,000/$10,000, framed as "we'll work with whatever budget you give us") rather than itemized per-deliverable pricing, so the buyer cannot see in advance exactly which outlets, links, or content units that budget converts into.
Cancellation requires 15 days' written notice before the renewal date or the next billing cycle still processes, and any signed SOW/order is explicitly non-cancellable by the customer per the published Terms of Service.
Verdict. Choose The HOTH when agencies and in-house marketers who want a single productized vendor to order backlinks, press releases, PR mentions, and "AI visibility" services a la carte or via a monthly managed-SEO retainer, without vetting individual publishers themselves..
For someone who genuinely wants an ongoing, low-cost pitching habit, regularly answering live journalist and podcast requests as a routine part of their own PR/content workflow, across many outlets over months, and who is fine with a hit-or-miss selection rate, Featured's $29-99/mo individual tiers are far cheaper per month than buying individual named placements, and bundle in competitor-coverage and AI-search (GEO) visibility tracking that Essentras doesn't sell as a subscription. A solo founder or in-house marketer who wants frequent at-bats rather than one guaranteed, specific outlet on a specific date is a genuinely better fit for Featured.
Measured, not asserted
The numbers behind this page
Every comparison on this site rests on two things we recompute rather than claim: the live catalog of what we actually sell, and a running study of what answer engines actually say. Both are linked below so you can check them.
Corpus figures recomputed 5 October 2026. Catalog figures are live.
How we compared
Every price on this page was read off the vendor's own public pricing page on 4 October 2026, not from a third-party listicle. Where a vendor publishes nothing, the row says "quote only" rather than carrying an estimate. 63 vendor pricing pages were checked for this cluster.
01Is every tier priced in public, including the largest one, or does the top plan route to a sales call?
02Can you know which outlet will publish before you pay, or only after a journalist picks your pitch?
03What renewal day looks like: minimum term, notice period, and whether fees already paid are refundable.
04Whether cost scales with attempts or with results, and what you have bought in a month where nothing publishes.
05Whether the link policy, dofollow or nofollow, is stated before purchase or left entirely to each publisher.
Deliberately excluded. Resellers of the vendors already listed, services that had stopped taking new customers at the time of review, and any provider whose core promise would require breaking a platform's terms of service.
Essentras sells services in this category, so this page is not a neutral review. Every competitor figure is published list pricing you can check on the vendor's own site, and the case for choosing a competitor over us is stated on every entry rather than left out.
The short version
Featured is a reasonable buy for someone who wants an AI-assisted habit of pitching journalist, podcast and byline requests regularly, and who can live with a hit-or-miss selection rate in exchange for a low monthly cost. It is the wrong buy for someone who needs one specific, named placement by a set date, since no tier of Featured, or any pitching marketplace, can promise that a given pitch is chosen. Essentras is not a substitute for that ongoing pitching habit either: it has no mechanism to put a source in front of 75,000+ journalists for a few dollars a month, and it does not sell regulated financial disclosure or a seat-based enterprise platform. Which one fits depends on whether the buyer wants pitching volume or a confirmed outcome.
FAQ
Featured (formerly Terkel) alternatives, FAQ
Featured (formerly Terkel) pricing: how much does it cost?▾
Featured has a free plan, then individual paid tiers at $29/mo (Lite), $79/mo (Pro) and $239/mo (Pro+), all billed annually, with month-to-month rates roughly 20 to 25% higher. Team plans with up to 25 seats run $199, $499 and $1,499/mo flat. Enterprise is custom, quote-only pricing. Every tier shares the same features and differs only by daily AI-usage allowance.
Is Featured worth it for journalist outreach?▾
It depends on what you need. Featured bundles AI-assisted pitching across HARO and Connectively queries, podcasts, bylines and awards in one subscription, useful for frequent, ongoing pitching. But every tier is metered by AI usage rather than outcomes, and a Trustpilot reviewer reported only 1 selection out of 48 answered questions, so it buys capacity to pitch, not a result.
What is the best Featured alternative?▾
There is no single best alternative, it depends on the job. Qwoted is the closest functional swap for pitching volume. Muck Rack suits a team that wants a database, CRM and monitoring in one annual licence. Essentras is the alternative for a buyer who wants a confirmed, named placement rather than another pitching queue.
Is there a free alternative to Featured?▾
Yes. HARO itself is free and reaches a stated 150,000+ registered sources and 75,000+ journalists, and Connectively's own Free tier gives 3 answers and 1 bylined article a month at $0. Source of Sources is a separate, fully free digest with no paid tier at any level, run by HARO's original founder.
What is the difference between Featured, HARO and Connectively?▾
Featured (legally Terkel, Inc.) owns both HARO and Connectively. HARO is the free, 3x-daily email of journalist queries. Connectively is Featured's paid Q&A platform built on the same queries, with early access and extra tools from $19/mo ($11/mo billed yearly). Featured itself is the separate AI-assisted pitching product with its own Free, Lite, Pro, Pro+ and Team tiers.
Does Featured guarantee a placement or a followed link?▾
No. There is no stated guarantee that a pitch is selected, no choice of which outlet or journalist uses it, and Featured's own site does not publish a policy on whether a resulting link is dofollow or nofollow. A subscription buys pitching capacity in a shared, competitive request pool, not a confirmed result.
How is Essentras different from Featured?▾
Featured sells a subscription to pitch into a shared pool of journalist, podcast and byline requests, where an editor decides whether, where and when anything runs. Essentras sells a specific, named placement in a chosen outlet, with its price, turnaround and dofollow or nofollow policy stated before payment, so the deliverable is the outcome itself rather than another entry in a pitching queue.
Who should use Muck Rack or Cision instead of Featured?▾
A comms team or agency that pitches media continuously across many stories or clients, and wants a journalist database, CRM, distribution and monitoring bundled into one annual, quote-only licence, is better served by Muck Rack or Cision. Both are built for an ongoing, in-house PR operation rather than ad hoc pitching, and neither publishes pricing without a sales conversation.
Keep comparing
The same decision, from the other three angles: head to head, category ranking, and what moving actually involves.