Free tool · powered by Essentras
Will AI cite insightrecoverynetwork.com?
AI Visibility Score, last checked Oct 24, 2026.
Niche addiction-placement service with modest third-party presence; needs original data and broader press to earn AI citations.
Low-to-moderate citation likelihood: five distinct third-party mentions (Trustpilot, LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook) establish basic entity recognition, but no Wikipedia, Knowledge Panel, or editorial press coverage limits visibility to AI engines. ChatGPT and Perplexity may cite for UK addiction-placement queries if the brand appears in their training corpora, but Google AI Overviews will favor entities with stronger reference-corpus presence and original statistics.
Entity authority
How much AI already trusts you across the web. The biggest driver of citations, and the hardest to DIY.
Five distinct third-party domains name Insight Recovery Network (Trustpilot reviews, LinkedIn profiles mentioning Craig Bilton's work, Instagram and Facebook social posts), establishing basic off-page entity recognition but lacking editorial press, comparison sites, or forum discussions.
Fix: Pursue editorial coverage in UK addiction-recovery publications, contribute expert commentary to health journalism, and seek inclusion in independent rehab-comparison or mental-health resource directories to broaden third-party mentions.
Get tier-1 press placements · from $250 →No Google Knowledge Panel found and no Wikipedia page; the brand owns its exact-match branded search, but entity clarity relies solely on schema markup and social profiles rather than a recognized knowledge-graph entry.
Fix: Build consistent citations across authoritative health directories, pursue press mentions that use the full brand name, and consider contributing to or being cited in Wikipedia articles on UK addiction services to establish knowledge-graph presence.
Get a Google Knowledge Panel · from $650 →No Wikipedia page exists for Insight Recovery Network, and the brand does not appear in reference corpora that AI engines prioritize (Wikipedia accounts for roughly 48% of ChatGPT's cited sources).
Fix: Aim for third-party coverage in sources that feed reference corpora—national health charities, peer-reviewed case studies, or UK government addiction-service directories—and ensure the brand is cited in any relevant Wikipedia articles on addiction treatment in Cornwall or the UK.
Get a Wikipedia page · $4,000, money-back →On-page extractability
How easily AI can read, understand and quote this specific page.
The page restates standard addiction-placement services (free guidance, international options, personal approach) without original statistics, proprietary research, treatment-outcome data, or unique case insights not found elsewhere.
Fix: Publish original data: anonymized success rates, cost-comparison tables for UK versus international rehab, or survey findings on family-intervention outcomes; include direct quotes from Craig Bilton's clinical experience that engines can extract as unique expert perspective.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →The page uses clear headings and a numbered three-step process (Understand, Compare, Coordinate), but most content is promotional prose rather than answer-first paragraphs, lists of treatment options, or tables comparing providers and costs.
Fix: Rewrite key sections with answer-first paragraphs (e.g., 'What does free placement guidance include?'), add bulleted lists of treatment types and locations, and insert a comparison table of UK versus international rehab costs and timelines.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →The footer displays a 2026 copyright year, signaling recent maintenance, but no article publication dates, last-updated timestamps, or dated case examples appear on the page.
Fix: Add visible 'Last updated' dates to service descriptions and publish timestamped blog posts or case studies to demonstrate ongoing content refresh.
No AI crawlers are blocked in robots.txt, the page is server-rendered with 1017 words visible to bots, and the site is indexed and accessible to GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot.
Comprehensive JSON-LD includes Professional Service, Person schema for Craig Bilton (named author with job title and description), contact details, and areas served; however, schema alone has near-zero causal effect on AI citation.
Fix: Maintain current schema for entity clarity, but prioritize off-page brand mentions and on-page original data over further schema expansion.
Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →What to fix, ranked by impact
Highest-leverage first. Purple and green: Essentras can do it for you. Grey: a do-it-yourself win.
Being named on independent, trusted publications is the strongest correlate of AI citation. It beats backlinks and domain authority. This is the #1 lever.
Three tier-1 outlets AI engines already read and cite. The fastest way to build the third-party mentions AI weighs most.
A Knowledge Panel is how Google and AI Overviews confirm you are a real entity worth citing.
Wikipedia is ~48% of ChatGPT’s cited sources. With no page, AI has no canonical reference to cite about you.
A professional, AI-indexed article about you on a real outlet. The fastest, cheapest way to give assistants something concrete to quote.
Information gain is the top causal on-page lever (+22-41% in controlled tests). Add a stat, benchmark or quote no other page has. Restating consensus barely helps.
Lead each section with a 1-3 sentence direct answer, then a list or real table. One heading = one question. AI can only cite what it can cleanly extract.
Don’t waste time on
- ✕Obsessing over schema / JSON-LD. Controlled before/after tests show it has no causal lift on AI citations. Keep it for normal Google rich results, but do not over-invest expecting AI to cite you because of it.
- ✕Adding an llms.txt file. AI crawlers do not read it (Google confirmed; ~0.1% of AI-bot requests hit it). It is speculative, not a ranking factor.
- ✕Chasing word count. Correlation between length and AI citation is ~0.04 (basically none). Originality and structure beat length every time.
How to fix this fast
AI barely sees you. The fastest fix is a citation on a source it already trusts.
We write and publish a professional article about you on a real, AI-cited outlet, indexed by Google and citable by ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Get your first placement for $9.99.
A score is a prediction. This is the receipt.
You now know if AI could cite you.
Want to know if it does?
The score above reads your page and predicts. The check does the opposite: it finds the questions your buyers actually type, using Google’s own search-volume data, puts them to 7 live AI models with the web open, and shows you the answer word for word.
Your name highlighted if it is in there. The competitors it named instead if it is not.
Run the free AI checkFree. No account, no card. About a minute.
somebody asks an AI: best crm for a small sales team
- 1HubSpot
- 2Pipedrive
- 3Salesforce
- 4Zoho CRM
your company?
A real answer from a real check. Names as the model returned them.
This scored one page. The full baseline scores your whole category.
We ask 50 buying questions about what you sell to ChatGPT, Meta AI, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, DeepSeek and Grok, then send you who got named instead of you, and why. $97, back in 2 business days.
Other sites we checked
Check any URL free at essentras.com/tools/ai-visibility-score.