Free tool · powered by Essentras

Will AI cite serene-rune-g9wpv9u.shipstatic.com?

AI Visibility Score, last checked Oct 28, 2026.

AI Visibility Score
23/100

Unknown brand on a third-party hosting subdomain with zero independent mentions; AI engines have nothing to cite.

4/100
Entity authority
46/100
On-page

Extremely unlikely to be cited by any AI engine. The brand 'SourceX' has no independent web presence, no press mentions, no Wikipedia page, and no Knowledge Panel—engines have no third-party validation that this entity exists or is trustworthy. The seven 'Shipstatic' mentions found are all about the hosting platform itself (GitHub repos, developer tools, static site deployment services), not this sourcing business, so they provide zero authority signal for SourceX.

Entity authority

How much AI already trusts you across the web. The biggest driver of citations, and the hardest to DIY.

Brand mentions & press (share of voice)
5/100

Zero independent third-party domains mention 'SourceX' or this sourcing business; all seven results found are about the Shipstatic hosting platform (developer tools, GitHub, Visual Studio marketplace), completely unrelated to this luxury sourcing service.

Fix: Build genuine press coverage, get featured in luxury lifestyle publications, sourcing industry blogs, or collector forums; earn mentions on independent domains that validate the business exists and serves real clients.

Get tier-1 press placements · from $97 →
Knowledge Panel & entity clarity
8/100

No Google Knowledge Panel exists, and the brand operates on a generic Shipstatic subdomain (serene-rune-g9wpv9u.shipstatic.com) rather than its own domain, making entity resolution nearly impossible for AI engines.

Fix: Migrate to a branded domain (sourcexllc.com or similar) and build consistent NAP citations across directories to establish a recognizable, resolvable entity that engines can confidently reference.

Get a Google Knowledge Panel · from $650 →
Wikipedia & reference-corpus presence
0/100

No Wikipedia page exists for SourceX, and the business has no presence in reference corpora that AI models rely on for factual grounding.

Fix: Wikipedia requires significant independent coverage first; focus on earning press mentions in notable publications, then consider whether notability guidelines are met in future.

Get a Wikipedia page · $4,000, money-back →

On-page extractability

How easily AI can read, understand and quote this specific page.

Information gain (original data & quotes)
25/100

The page lists service categories (luxury cars, real estate, watches, comics) but provides no original data, case studies, pricing insights, sourcing statistics, client testimonials, or unique information not found in generic concierge service descriptions.

Fix: Add original content: anonymized case studies of successful sourcing projects, market insights on rare collectibles, pricing data for vintage watches, or exclusive interviews with collectors—anything that makes this page a unique information source.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →
Extractable structure (answer-first, lists, tables)
48/100

The page uses clear emoji-marked headings for each service category and includes contact details, but lacks answer-first paragraphs, structured FAQ sections, or tables that would make information easily extractable for AI engines.

Fix: Add an FAQ section answering common sourcing questions (How long does sourcing take? What are your fees? Success rate?), use answer-first paragraphs under each service heading, and consider a comparison table of sourcing timelines by item category.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →
Freshness
35/100

The footer shows a 2026 copyright year, but no article dates, last-updated timestamps, or recent project announcements signal to engines that information is current.

Fix: Add a blog or news section with dated posts about recent sourcing successes, market trends, or new service offerings; include visible last-updated dates on service descriptions if they change.

Technical eligibility (crawlable, AI bots allowed)
85/100

The page is server-rendered with 346 words visible to crawlers, no AI bots are blocked in robots.txt, and the site is technically accessible to all major AI engines.

Schema & on-page E-E-A-T
55/100

Professional Service schema is present with founder name (David Weston), contact details, and service area, but no author credentials, certifications, or expertise signals beyond the schema markup itself.

Fix: Add a visible About page with David Weston's background in luxury sourcing, industry credentials, years of experience, and client testimonials; schema alone carries minimal weight without on-page validation.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →

What to fix, ranked by impact

Highest-leverage first. Purple and green: Essentras can do it for you. Grey: a do-it-yourself win.

Tier-1 press placementsfrom $97

Being named on independent, trusted publications is the strongest correlate of AI citation. It beats backlinks and domain authority. This is the #1 lever.

Fix this →
Business Insider / Yahoo / AP News bundle$833

Three tier-1 outlets AI engines already read and cite. The fastest way to build the third-party mentions AI weighs most.

Fix this →
Google Knowledge Panelfrom $650

A Knowledge Panel is how Google and AI Overviews confirm you are a real entity worth citing.

Fix this →
Wikipedia page creation$4,000, money-back

In Profound’s analysis of ChatGPT citations from Aug 2024 to Jun 2025, Wikipedia was the most cited source, at 7.8% of all citations. With no page, there is no encyclopedia entry for assistants to cite about you.

Fix this →
MarketSpy placement ($9.99 intro)$9.99

A professional, AI-indexed article about you on a real outlet. The fastest, cheapest way to give assistants something concrete to quote.

Fix this →
Add original data or a direct quoteDIY

In the GEO study (Aggarwal et al., KDD 2024), adding statistics, quotations and cited sources raised visibility in its test answers by 30 to 40%. Add a stat, benchmark or quote no other page has; restating what others say adds little.

Make it answer-first and extractableDIY

Lead each section with a 1-3 sentence direct answer, then a list or real table. One heading = one question. AI can only cite what it can cleanly extract.

Show a real, recent update dateDIY

In an Ahrefs study of 17 million citations (Jul 2025), pages cited by AI assistants were 25.7% newer on average than pages in Google’s organic results. Update pages when the facts change and show a genuine last-updated date; Google warns against changing dates without real changes.

Don’t waste time on

  • ✕Obsessing over schema / JSON-LD. Controlled before/after tests show it has no causal lift on AI citations. Keep it for normal Google rich results, but do not over-invest expecting AI to cite you because of it.
  • ✕Adding an llms.txt file for Google. Google says Google Search ignores llms.txt files: they neither help nor harm your visibility there. Keep the file only if another service uses it.
  • ✕Chasing word count. Google says it has no preferred word count and no ideal page length: write as long as the reader needs.

How to fix this fast

AI barely sees you. The fastest fix is a citation on a source it already trusts.

We write and publish a professional article about you on a real, AI-cited outlet, indexed by Google and citable by ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Get your first placement for $9.99.

A score is a prediction. This is the receipt.

You now know if AI could cite you.
Want to know if it does?

The score above reads your page and predicts. The check does the opposite: it finds the questions your buyers actually type, using Google’s own search-volume data, puts them to 7 live AI models with the web open, and shows you the answer word for word.

Your name highlighted if it is in there. The competitors it named instead if it is not.

Run the free AI check

Free. No account, no card. About a minute.

somebody asks an AI: best crm for a small sales team

  1. 1HubSpot
  2. 2Pipedrive
  3. 3Salesforce
  4. 4Zoho CRM
5

your company?

A real answer from a real check. Names as the model returned them.

This scored one page. The full baseline scores your whole category.

We ask 50 buying questions about what you sell to ChatGPT, Meta AI, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, DeepSeek and Grok, then send you who got named instead of you, and why. $97, back in 2 business days.

Check any URL free at essentras.com/tools/ai-visibility-score.