Authority Audit · powered by Essentras

How does Vellum show up online?

Authority Audit, last checked 14 Sept 2026.

Authority Audit · Vellum

45/100
Emerging Report ready

Jesse Tunnicliff and Vellum lack foundational online authority, with no search rankings for the name, minimal media coverage from non-tier-1 outlets, and absence from Wikipedia and major social platforms. Immediate priority should be establishing verifiable media presence and a Wikipedia page with credible sourcing to build baseline credibility across AI systems and search engines.

SearchPressAIWikipediaReviewsHandles
5
gaps found
1
quick wins
6/6
checks run

Priority fixes

Ranked by impact on the score. Each links straight to the service that closes it.

1
Wikipedia Page Creation$4,000, money-back guarantee

Establish a neutral, well-sourced Wikipedia page, backed by a money-back guarantee.

Fix this
2
Digital PR programCustom

Feed the models the authoritative, structured coverage they cite, so they describe you accurately.

Fix this
3
Tier-1 Press Placementsfrom $250

Push recognizable, indexable coverage onto your first page.

Fix this
4
Google Knowledge Panelfrom $650

Establish a Google Knowledge Panel so your verified facts show beside your name in search.

Fix this
5
Premium Username Claimsfrom $15,000

Claim and lock a clean, consistent handle across the platforms that matter.

Fix this

The full breakdown

Search presence57
Needs workNothing authoritative ranks for your name.
  • No overtly negative results on your first page.
  • Of the top 10: 2 owned/professional, 0 tier-1 press, 0 reference sources, 3 social, 0 thin or syndicated.
  • Nothing recognizable or encyclopedic ranks for your name, so a searcher has no way to verify who you are.
Tier-1 Press Placements
Press and media95
StrongCovered by 10 outlets, none tier-1.
  • Found 10 distinct outlets covering you.
  • You have coverage, but none of it is in the tier-1 outlets buyers and journalists recognize.
AI visibility12
ExposedChatGPT: no reliable info · Claude: no reliable info
  • ChatGPT: no reliable info. ChatGPT claims no reliable information available.
  • Claude: no reliable info. Claude claims no reliable information available.
  • When AI cannot describe you accurately, every buyer who asks it about you hears silence or worse.
ChatGPTClaude
Digital PR program
Wikipedia10
ExposedNo Wikipedia page found.
  • No Wikipedia article matches you. Wikipedia is the single biggest input to the Google Knowledge Panel and to what AI assistants state as fact about you.
Wikipedia Page Creation
Reputation and reviews-
Not applicableNo public review profile found for Vellum.
  • No Google Business Profile or Trustpilot page is indexed for Vellum. There are no reviews to clean up, so this is neutral, not a gap.
Handles and socials48
Needs workOn 1 of 4 core platforms.
  • Discoverable on Instagram.
  • Missing or not discoverable on TikTok, YouTube, X.
Instagram
Premium Username Claims

How this was measured

  • Google first-page results and Knowledge Panel via a live SERP scan.
  • Wikipedia via the official Wikipedia REST API.
  • AI visibility by asking ChatGPT and Claude, the assistants people actually use, who you are.
  • Reputation via Google rating, Trustpilot presence, and negative-sentiment results.
  • Handle consistency across Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and X from indexed profiles.

Run your own free audit at essentras.com/tools/authority-audit.