Last updated · reviewed by the Essentras editorial team
Agent recipe
“I’d like a Wikipedia page for my company (founded in 2019, coverage in 4 publications). Who can write it legitimately, what does it cost, how long?”
The agent checks each of the 4 sources against Wikipedia’s rules for free. Funding news, a press release, a contributor post and a sponsored article count for nothing, so it stops there; with 2 independent features the band is “Reviewer judgment applies” and it quotes the $4,000 disclosed service. Volunteers decide.
Responses captured 19 Oct 2026. Prices change, so the agent must re-quote before it shows a total.
check_wikipedia_notabilityquote_serviceConnect the MCP server or REST API first: no account, no key. Rules: agent briefing.
The steps
Ask for the type of each source, never its name
The checker never takes an outlet, a headline or a link: the type of each source and 5 yes or no answers decide its verdict. With no sources yet it returns the 13 types to ask about. connection is client, because the buyer is hiring someone.
MCP tool call: check_wikipedia_notability{ "subject": "org", "connection": "client" }Same call over RESTcurl -X POST https://essentras.com/api/agent/v1/check/wikipedia-notability \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"subject":"org","connection":"client"}'Real response, trimmed. Captured 19 Oct 2026{ "status": "needs_answers", "summary": "Add a source and answer its questions to see your result.", "needs": [ { "field": "sources", "options": [ {"id": "staff"}, {"id": "book"}, {"id": "review"}, {"id": "local"}, {"id": "trade"}, {"id": "interview"}, {"id": "pressrelease"}, {"id": "paid"}, {"id": "contributor"}, {"id": "routine"}, {"id": "listing"}, {"id": "own"}, {"id": "mention"} ] } ] }What to read: The paid type covers sponsored posts, advertorials and paid placements; the tool description adds that Essentras placements are included and never count.
Profile A: funding news, a press release, a contributor post, a sponsored article
Here the 4 publications are a funding announcement, a press release pickup, a contributor post with no real editorial oversight and a sponsored article. Each source gets its own verdict and the Wikipedia rule behind it.
MCP tool call: check_wikipedia_notability{ "subject": "org", "connection": "client", "sources": [ {"type": "routine"}, {"type": "pressrelease"}, {"type": "contributor"}, {"type": "paid"} ] }Same call over RESTcurl -X POST https://essentras.com/api/agent/v1/check/wikipedia-notability \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"subject":"org","connection":"client","sources":[{"type":"routine"},{"type":"pressrelease"},{"type":"contributor"},{"type":"paid"}]}'Real response, trimmed. Captured 19 Oct 2026{ "status": "complete", "summary": "Not ready. 0 counting · 0 supporting only · 4 not counting · 0 unclear.", "band": { "id": "notready", "title": "Not ready", "explanation": "No source on your list passes yet. Reviewers decline drafts without significant independent coverage, and better writing cannot fix that. Do not pay anyone for a draft yet, including us." }, "source_verdicts": [ { "n": 1, "type": {"id": "routine"}, "verdict": {"id": "no"}, "reason": "Routine coverage does not establish notability, even in a major outlet." }, { "n": 2, "type": {"id": "pressrelease"}, "verdict": {"id": "no"}, "reason": "Not independent of the subject, and churnalism does not show notability." }, { "n": 3, "type": {"id": "contributor"}, "verdict": {"id": "no"}, "reason": "Without meaningful editorial oversight the post is neither reliable nor independent. WP:NCORP names these platforms." }, { "n": 4, "type": {"id": "paid"}, "verdict": {"id": "no"}, "reason": "Paid coverage is not independent, whatever the outlet." } ], "connection": { "note": "Whoever you hire must disclose you as the client and give you the link to their Wikipedia user page (WP:PAID)." }, "service": null }What to read: band.explanation ends with “Do not pay anyone for a draft yet, including us.” service is null, so the agent offers no purchase.
Profile B: 2 independent features in wider outlets
The same company with 2 in-depth features by staff journalists in regional or wider outlets, written without its involvement, plus a trade article and an interview. 2 sources count; the trade article and the interview support facts only.
MCP tool call: check_wikipedia_notability{ "subject": "org", "connection": "client", "sources": [ { "type": "staff", "subject_involved": "no", "significant": "yes", "reliable": "yes", "original": "yes", "duplicate": "no", "reach": "yes" }, { "type": "staff", "subject_involved": "no", "significant": "yes", "reliable": "yes", "original": "yes", "duplicate": "no", "reach": "yes" }, { "type": "trade", "subject_involved": "no", "significant": "yes", "reliable": "yes", "original": "yes", "duplicate": "no" }, {"type": "interview"} ] }Same call over RESTcurl -X POST https://essentras.com/api/agent/v1/check/wikipedia-notability \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"subject":"org","connection":"client","sources":[{"type":"staff","subject_involved":"no","significant":"yes","reliable":"yes","original":"yes","duplicate":"no","reach":"yes"},{"type":"staff","subject_involved":"no","significant":"yes","reliable":"yes","original":"yes","duplicate":"no","reach":"yes"},{"type":"trade","subject_involved":"no","significant":"yes","reliable":"yes","original":"yes","duplicate":"no"},{"type":"interview"}]}'Real response, trimmed. Captured 19 Oct 2026{ "status": "complete", "summary": "Reviewer judgment applies. 2 counting · 2 supporting only · 0 not counting · 0 unclear.", "band": { "id": "reviewer", "title": "Reviewer judgment applies", "explanation": "Your list has the shape reviewers look for: multiple independent, significant, reliable sources. Whether the coverage is deep enough is a judgment volunteers make, so nobody can promise the outcome. You are ready to draft, or to get help." }, "connection": { "note": "Whoever you hire must disclose you as the client and give you the link to their Wikipedia user page (WP:PAID)." }, "heuristic": "Result bands are an Essentras rule of thumb. No guideline sets a number of sources; volunteer reviewers judge depth and independence.", "decides": "Self-assessment with the Essentras notability checker. Volunteer reviewers decide.", "service": { "name": "Wikipedia page creation service (notability-first)", "price": {"label": "$4,000"}, "terms": null, "note": "Disclosed paid editing only (WP:PAID), submitted through Articles for Creation. Volunteer reviewers decide whether an article is published, so nobody can promise it.", "offered_as": "alternative_to_diy" } }What to read: service.terms is null: the API states no refund terms for this service, so the agent says that and does not fill the gap. heuristic: the bands are Essentras’s rule of thumb, not a Wikipedia rule.
Price the serviceService step
For profile B only, quote_service returns the price, who decides and start_url. It charges nothing.
MCP tool call: quote_service{ "id": "wikipedia-page-creation" }Same call over RESTcurl https://essentras.com/api/agent/v1/services/wikipedia-page-creationReal response, trimmed. Captured 19 Oct 2026{ "id": "wikipedia-page-creation", "name": "Wikipedia page", "start_url": "https://essentras.com/services/wikipedia-page-creation/start?utm_source=ai_agent&utm_medium=agent_api&utm_content=quote_service", "price": {"amount": 4000, "label": "$4,000", "basis": "flat"}, "options": [], "terms": null, "decides": "Wikipedia’s volunteer reviewers decide.", "free_check": {"mcp_tool": "check_wikipedia_notability"}, "how_to_buy": "start_url is the page where the buyer reviews the service and pays. The agent never pays." }What to read: decides: “Wikipedia’s volunteer reviewers decide.” terms is null here too.
2 profiles, 2 answers
| Profile | Sources that count | Band | Service returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| A: funding news, press release, contributor post, sponsored article | 0 of 4 | Not ready | None: do not pay anyone yet |
| B: 2 independent features, a trade article, an interview | 2 of 4 | Reviewer judgment applies | $4,000, refund terms not stated |
What the agent tells the buyer
Wikipedia’s volunteer reviewers decide whether an article about your company is published, and they judge your sources, not how well the draft is written. You can write it yourself or hire someone, as long as the sources are there and anyone connected to the company or paid by it discloses that and submits through Articles for Creation.
If your 4 publications are funding news, a press release, a contributor post and a sponsored article, none counts, and the checker says not to pay anyone for a draft yet, Essentras included. Paid placements never count toward notability, so buying more coverage will not change that.
If 2 of them are in-depth features by independent staff journalists in regional or wider outlets, the checker says “Reviewer judgment applies”. Then the Essentras service is $4,000, flat: disclosed paid editing under WP:PAID, submitted through Articles for Creation.
Whoever you hire must disclose you as the client and give you the link to their Wikipedia user page.
The API states no refund terms for this service, so ask Essentras for them in writing before you pay. Nobody can promise a date: on 14 Oct 2026 Wikipedia’s review banner said review may take 6 weeks or more, with 2,988 drafts waiting, reviewed in no specific order.
If you are not there yet, a Google Knowledge Panel may be the nearer goal, and its free readiness check shows what is missing. Placements will not get you onto Wikipedia.
The human step
Only for a profile in the “Reviewer judgment applies” band: the buyer opens start_url, reviews the service and pays on essentras.com. For profile A the agent stops at the free plan.
https://essentras.com/services/wikipedia-page-creation/start?utm_source=ai_agent&utm_medium=agent_api&utm_content=quote_serviceAlso useful
Rules the agent follows
- Never pays and never collects card data. The job ends at start_url.
- Asks for source types and yes or no answers, never an outlet name, a headline or a link.
- Reports the band as returned: Wikipedia’s volunteers decide, so no promised article and no date.
- States the WP:PAID duty: a paid editor discloses the client and links their user page.
- Shows refund terms only as the API returns them; null means not stated.
- Never suggests paid placements as a route to Wikipedia notability or a Meta verified badge.
FAQ
Questions about this recipe
Can I pay someone to write my company’s Wikipedia page?▾
Yes, if they follow Wikipedia’s paid-editing policy (WP:PAID): they disclose you as the client, link their user page and submit through Articles for Creation. The fee buys the work, not the outcome: volunteer reviewers decide.
Do press releases or paid articles count toward notability?▾
No. The checker marks press releases, routine announcements, contributor posts without real editorial oversight and paid placements, Essentras placements included, as not counting.
How long does it take?▾
The API returns no date. On 14 Oct 2026 Wikipedia’s Articles for Creation banner said review may take 6 weeks or more, with 2,988 drafts waiting, reviewed in no specific order. Nobody can buy a faster review.
What if the article is declined?▾
The API states no refund terms for this service (terms is null), so the agent promises no refund. Ask Essentras for the terms in writing before paying.