Free tool · powered by Essentras

Will AI cite deepseek.com?

AI Visibility Score, last checked Nov 12, 2026.

AI Visibility Score
56/100

Strong AI citation potential from Wikipedia presence and 16 distinct press mentions, but homepage lacks extractable information gain.

74/100
Entity authority
35/100
On-page

ChatGPT and Perplexity are highly likely to cite DeepSeek when answering questions about Chinese AI companies or open-source models, drawing from Wikipedia and the extensive press coverage across Bloomberg, Reuters, and tech outlets. Google AI Overviews may cite less frequently due to the missing Knowledge Panel and the homepage's thin, navigation-focused content that lacks original data or quotable insights.

Entity authority

How much AI already trusts you across the web. The biggest driver of citations, and the hardest to DIY.

Brand mentions & press (share of voice)
78/100

DeepSeek is named across 16 distinct third-party domains including Wikipedia, Bloomberg, Reuters, South China Morning Post, and major tech platforms like GitHub and Hugging Face, indicating strong share of voice in AI industry coverage.

Fix: Continue earning editorial mentions by releasing original research and model benchmarks that journalists and analysts can cite.

Knowledge Panel & entity clarity
55/100

DeepSeek owns its branded search and has consistent identity across platforms, but lacks a Google Knowledge Panel which would help engines resolve entity queries more reliably.

Fix: Work toward triggering a Google Knowledge Panel by ensuring consistent structured citations across authoritative sources and maintaining active Wikidata presence.

Get a Google Knowledge Panel · from $650 →
Wikipedia & reference-corpus presence
85/100

DeepSeek has a dedicated Wikipedia page describing it as a Chinese artificial intelligence company, placing it in the reference corpus that ChatGPT heavily relies on.

On-page extractability

How easily AI can read, understand and quote this specific page.

Information gain (original data & quotes)
15/100

The homepage is a navigation shell with product links and version announcements but contains no original statistics, research findings, benchmark data, or quotable insights that engines could extract as unique information.

Fix: Add a section with original model performance metrics, training statistics, or architectural innovations with specific numbers that distinguish DeepSeek's approach from competitors.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →
Extractable structure (answer-first, lists, tables)
25/100

The page is a client-rendered navigation interface with minimal text, no answer-first paragraphs, no explanatory headings, and no lists or tables that engines can extract structured information from.

Fix: Create answer-first sections explaining what DeepSeek is, what problems it solves, and key differentiators, using clear headings and bullet lists for model capabilities or use cases.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →
Freshness
60/100

The page mentions a recent version update to V4.1-Flash-1017 and shows a 2026 copyright date, indicating some freshness signals, though no explicit publication or update timestamps are present.

Fix: Add visible last-updated dates to content sections and news announcements to strengthen freshness signals for time-sensitive AI queries.

Technical eligibility (crawlable, AI bots allowed)
95/100

No AI crawler blocking detected in robots.txt, and the page is indexed and accessible to GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers, ensuring technical eligibility.

Schema & on-page E-E-A-T
10/100

No JSON-LD structured data present, no named authors or credentials visible, and no organization schema to help engines understand the entity structure.

Fix: Add Organization schema with founding information, and consider Article or FAQ schema for any content sections you add, though prioritize the information gain fixes first as schema alone has minimal citation impact.

Publish a cite-worthy article on MarketSpy · $9.99 intro →

What to fix, ranked by impact

Highest-leverage first. Purple and green: Essentras can do it for you. Grey: a do-it-yourself win.

MarketSpy placement ($9.99 intro)$9.99

A professional, AI-indexed article about you on a real outlet. The fastest, cheapest way to give assistants something concrete to quote.

Fix this →
Add original data or a direct quoteDIY

In the GEO study (Aggarwal et al., KDD 2024), adding statistics, quotations and cited sources raised visibility in its test answers by 30 to 40%. Add a stat, benchmark or quote no other page has; restating what others say adds little.

Make it answer-first and extractableDIY

Lead each section with a 1-3 sentence direct answer, then a list or real table. One heading = one question. AI can only cite what it can cleanly extract.

Don’t waste time on

  • ✕Obsessing over schema / JSON-LD. Controlled before/after tests show it has no causal lift on AI citations. Keep it for normal Google rich results, but do not over-invest expecting AI to cite you because of it.
  • ✕Adding an llms.txt file for Google. Google says Google Search ignores llms.txt files: they neither help nor harm your visibility there. Keep the file only if another service uses it.
  • ✕Chasing word count. Google says it has no preferred word count and no ideal page length: write as long as the reader needs.

How to fix this fast

AI barely sees you. The fastest fix is a citation on a source it already trusts.

We write and publish a professional article about you on a real, AI-cited outlet, indexed by Google and citable by ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity. Get your first placement for $9.99.

A score is a prediction. This is the receipt.

You now know if AI could cite you.
Want to know if it does?

The score above reads your page and predicts. The check does the opposite: it finds the questions your buyers actually type, using Google’s own search-volume data, puts them to 7 live AI models with the web open, and shows you the answer word for word.

Your name highlighted if it is in there. The competitors it named instead if it is not.

Run the free AI check

Free. No account, no card. About a minute.

somebody asks an AI: best crm for a small sales team

  1. 1HubSpot
  2. 2Pipedrive
  3. 3Salesforce
  4. 4Zoho CRM
5

your company?

A real answer from a real check. Names as the model returned them.

This scored one page. The full baseline scores your whole category.

We ask 50 buying questions about what you sell to ChatGPT, Meta AI, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, DeepSeek and Grok, then send you who got named instead of you, and why. $97, back in 2 business days.

Check any URL free at essentras.com/tools/ai-visibility-score.