Live ranking, refreshed every 2 days

Best AI Models for Creative Writing

As of October 8, 2026, the top-ranked model on LMArena's text leaderboard, creative writing category is gemini-4-argon-high by Google with a score of 1,519, 2 points ahead of claude-opus-5.5-high by Anthropic.

Updated October 13, 2026. Showing the last saved copy of the leaderboard, dated October 8, 2026, because the live source could not be reached.

Ranking: top 10 models

Scores come from blind head-to-head votes on LMArena's text leaderboard, creative writing category. Rank is LMArena's published rank, which accounts for confidence intervals, so several models can share a rank. The top 10 are shown below, and ranks 11 to 40 follow in the expandable list.

Models ranked by arena score
RankModelLabScoreVotesLicense
1gemini-4-argon-highGoogle1,519 ±201,053Proprietary
2claude-opus-5.5-highAnthropic1,517 ±171,480Proprietary
3claude-fable-5-highAnthropic1,502 ±88,592Proprietary
4claude-opus-4-6-highAnthropic1,500 ±614,532Proprietary
5gemini-3.7-flash-highGoogle1,492 ±95,338Proprietary
6claude-opus-4-7-highAnthropic1,489 ±711,857Proprietary
7gemini-3.8-flash-highGoogle1,487 ±86,851Proprietary
8gemini-3-proGoogle1,485 ±86,545Proprietary
9claude-fable-5.1-maxAnthropic1,483 ±122,939Proprietary
10claude-opus-4-7Anthropic1,483 ±712,081Proprietary
Show ranks 11 to 40
Rank Model                                Lab             Score         License
11   gemini-3.1-pro-preview               Google          1,481 ±5      Proprietary
12   claude-opus-4-6                      Anthropic       1,479 ±6      Proprietary
13   claude-opus-5-high                   Anthropic       1,471 ±7      Proprietary
14   claude-opus-5-max                    Anthropic       1,471 ±8      Proprietary
15   gemini-3.6-flash-high                Google          1,471 ±8      Proprietary
16   qwen3.8-max                          Alibaba (Qwen)  1,470 ±9      Proprietary
17   claude-opus-4-5-20251101-high-32k    Anthropic       1,469 ±8      Proprietary
18   claude-opus-4-8-high                 Anthropic       1,469 ±7      Proprietary
19   gemini-3.5-flash-medium              Google          1,469 ±7      Proprietary
20   gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh                    OpenAI          1,468 ±8      Proprietary
21   muse-spark                           Meta            1,465 ±14     Proprietary
22   gemini-3.5-flash-high                Google          1,464 ±7      Proprietary
23   grok-4.20-beta1                      xAI             1,463 ±10     Proprietary
24   claude-sonnet-5.5-xhigh              Anthropic       1,463 ±19     Proprietary
25   claude-opus-4-8                      Anthropic       1,463 ±7      Proprietary
26   gpt-6.1-sol-max                      OpenAI          1,462 ±20     Proprietary
27   claude-opus-4-5-20251101             Anthropic       1,462 ±6      Proprietary
28   kimi-k3-max                          Moonshot AI     1,460 ±8      Open weights
29   gemini-3-flash                       Google          1,457 ±9      Proprietary
30   muse-spark-1.3-max                   Meta            1,456 ±11     Proprietary
31   gpt-5.5-instant                      OpenAI          1,456 ±10     Proprietary
32   glm-5.3-max                          Z.ai (Zhipu)    1,454 ±10     Open weights
33   claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929           Anthropic       1,454 ±6      Proprietary
34   muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh)               Meta            1,453 ±17     Proprietary
35   glm-5.2-max                          Z.ai (Zhipu)    1,453 ±7      Open weights
36   grok-4.5                             xAI             1,452 ±8      Proprietary
37   gpt-5.5-high                         OpenAI          1,452 ±7      Proprietary
38   claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-high-32k  Anthropic       1,450 ±6      Proprietary
39   claude-sonnet-4-6                    Anthropic       1,449 ±7      Proprietary
40   glm-5                                Z.ai (Zhipu)    1,449 ±9      Open weights

Showing the top 40 of 412 models on this leaderboard. Data from October 8, 2026.

Best model by lab

Each lab's highest-ranked model on this leaderboard, and how far it sits from the top.

LabBest modelRankScoreBehind #1
Googlegemini-4-argon-high11,519Leader
Anthropicclaude-opus-5.5-high21,5172 pts
Alibaba (Qwen)qwen3.8-max161,47050 pts
OpenAIgpt-5.6-sol-xhigh201,46851 pts
Metamuse-spark211,46555 pts
xAIgrok-4.20-beta1231,46356 pts
Moonshot AIkimi-k3-max281,46059 pts
Z.ai (Zhipu)glm-5.3-max321,45465 pts

Which AI lab leads?

The lab with the most models at the top of the board is the one with the deepest bench, not only the single best model.

Anthropic holds 6 of the top 10 models (60%).

Models in the top 10 by lab

Models in the top 10 by labBar chart of how many of the top 10 models each lab has: Anthropic 6, Google 4.Anthropic6Google4
Show data table
LabTop 10
Anthropic6
Google4

Open vs proprietary: how big is the gap?

The best open-weight model is kimi-k3-max by Moonshot AI at 1,460, 59 points behind the best proprietary model, gemini-4-argon-high by Google at 1,519. Their 95% confidence intervals do not overlap, so the gap is statistically meaningful.

27 proprietary models rank above the best open-weight model, and 0 of the top 20 are open-weight.

Open-weight here means any license other than Proprietary, including licenses with usage limits. It is a broader definition than the OSI one.

Other leaderboards

LMArena runs separate arenas for different jobs. The best model for one is often not the best for another.

Other arenas

Text arena by category

Text arena by language

How to read this leaderboard

This category filters the text arena to stories, poems, scripts and other creative prompts, where taste matters more than a single correct answer.

Scores come from blind votes
LMArena shows a person two anonymous answers to the same prompt and asks which is better. Those head-to-head votes are fitted with a Bradley-Terry model, the statistical successor to Elo, to give each model one arena score. On the Elo scale LMArena uses, a 100-point lead means the higher model is expected to win about 64% of matchups.
Confidence intervals decide ties
Every score carries a 95% confidence interval. When two intervals overlap, the order of those two models is not settled. LMArena's rank column already accounts for this, which is why more than one model can hold the same rank.
Why it differs from usage share
A high rank does not mean many people use a model. Usage depends on price, distribution and habit. For adoption rather than quality, see AI market share.

Methodology and source

All rankings are read from the LMArena leaderboard dataset on Hugging Face, published by LMArena (formerly Chatbot Arena) under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Credit for the underlying votes, scores and confidence intervals belongs to LMArena. Essentras is not affiliated with LMArena.

This page reads the text_style_control subset, category creative_writing, from the dataset's latest split. Scores, intervals, ranks, vote counts and license labels are shown as published. Essentras adds the grouping by lab and the derived figures on this page: gaps, lab shares, open vs proprietary and, on the main page, the history of who held #1.

Data refreshes automatically every 2 days. If the source cannot be reached, the page falls back to the last saved copy and says so at the top. Models are never merged or renamed; model and lab names appear exactly as LMArena publishes them.

Open-weight means any license other than Proprietary. History is limited to what the dataset records: the style-controlled text leaderboard from August 28, 2024. We do not scrape any other ranking site.

Track how AI models rank and describe your brand with our AI SEO service. Want these models to name your brand? Read our guide to LLM SEO.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI model for creative writing?

As of October 8, 2026, gemini-4-argon-high by Google ranks first on LMArena's text leaderboard, creative writing category with a score of 1,519. Rankings move as models and votes are added, so check the table above for the current order.

Which AI lab leads for creative writing?

Anthropic holds 6 of the top 10 models (60%), ahead of Google (4).

Is the best open-source model close to the best proprietary model?

The best open-weight model is kimi-k3-max by Moonshot AI at 1,460, 59 points behind the best proprietary model, gemini-4-argon-high by Google at 1,519. 27 proprietary models rank above the best open-weight model, and 0 of the top 20 are open-weight. Their 95% confidence intervals do not overlap, so the gap is statistically meaningful. "Open" here means any license other than Proprietary, which is broader than the OSI definition.

What does this leaderboard measure?

This category filters the text arena to stories, poems, scripts and other creative prompts, where taste matters more than a single correct answer.

How often does this leaderboard update?

This page re-reads LMArena's dataset every 2 days. LMArena publishes a new snapshot when it has gathered enough votes or added models, so the date at the top shows the latest published data.

Models rank themselves. What do they say about you?

A leaderboard shows which AI models are strongest. It does not show what those models tell your customers about your company. Run the free check and see the answers.