Live ranking, refreshed every 2 days

Best AI Video Generators

As of September 22, 2026, the top-ranked model on LMArena's text-to-video leaderboard is gemini-omni-1.1-flash by Google with a score of 1,516, 3 points ahead of gemini-omni-flash by Google.

Updated October 14, 2026. Leaderboard data from September 22, 2026.

Ranking: top 10 models

Scores come from blind head-to-head votes on LMArena's text-to-video leaderboard. Rank is LMArena's published rank, which accounts for confidence intervals, so several models can share a rank. The top 10 are shown below, and ranks 11 to 40 follow in the expandable list.

Models ranked by arena score
RankModelLabScoreVotesLicense
1gemini-omni-1.1-flashGoogle1,516 ±151,784Proprietary
2gemini-omni-flashGoogle1,513 ±926,576Proprietary
3flux-3-videoBfl1,493 ±171,302Proprietary
4grok-imagine-video-1.5-agentxAI1,492 ±181,218Proprietary
5dreamina-seedance-2.0-720pByteDance1,479 ±856,318Proprietary
6wan3.0Alibaba (Qwen)1,476 ±132,598Proprietary
7dreamina-seedance-2.5-720pByteDance1,474 ±98,001Proprietary
8minimax-h3MiniMax1,460 ±911,417Open weights
9muse-videoMeta1,456 ±152,188Proprietary
10happyhorse-1.0Aorizon1,427 ±1322,264Proprietary
Show ranks 11 to 40
Rank Model                     Lab             Score         License
11   sora-2-pro                OpenAI          1,368 ±7      Proprietary
12   veo-3.1-audio             Google          1,364 ±14     Proprietary
13   veo-3.1-audio-1080p       Google          1,362 ±10     Proprietary
14   veo-3.1-fast-audio        Google          1,362 ±10     Proprietary
15   veo-3.1-fast-audio-1080p  Google          1,358 ±10     Proprietary
16   veo-3-fast-audio          Google          1,348 ±11     Proprietary
17   sora-2                    OpenAI          1,343 ±6      Proprietary
18   grok-imagine-video-720p   xAI             1,342 ±6      Proprietary
19   veo-3-audio               Google          1,340 ±13     Proprietary
20   wan2.7-t2v                Wan             1,337 ±7      Proprietary
21   wan2.6-t2v                Alibaba (Qwen)  1,327 ±7      Proprietary
22   seedance-v1.5-pro         ByteDance       1,256 ±7      Proprietary
23   veo-3                     Google          1,254 ±11     Proprietary
24   veo-3-fast                Google          1,248 ±12     Proprietary
25   wan2.5-t2v-preview        Alibaba (Qwen)  1,245 ±9      Proprietary
26   pixverse-v5.6             Other           1,240 ±11     Proprietary
27   runway-gen-4.5            Runway          1,225 ±9      Proprietary
28   kling-2.5-turbo-1080p     Kling           1,220 ±17     Proprietary
29   kling-2.6-pro             Kling           1,216 ±7      Proprietary
30   p-video                   Other           1,207 ±16     Proprietary
31   ray-3                     Luma Ai         1,206 ±22     Proprietary
32   hailuo-2.3                MiniMax         1,206 ±6      Proprietary
33   kling-o1-pro              Kling           1,205 ±27     Proprietary
34   hailuo-02-pro             MiniMax         1,198 ±13     Proprietary
35   seedance-v1-pro           ByteDance       1,191 ±11     Proprietary
36   hailuo-02-standard        MiniMax         1,181 ±12     Proprietary
37   kandinsky-5.0-t2v-pro     Kandinsky       1,175 ±21     Open weights
38   hunyuan-video-1.5         Tencent         1,169 ±16     Open weights
39   veo-2                     Google          1,164 ±16     Proprietary
40   kling-v2.1-master         Kling           1,163 ±10     Proprietary

Showing the top 40 of 48 models on this leaderboard. Data from September 22, 2026.

Best model by lab

Each lab's highest-ranked model on this leaderboard, and how far it sits from the top.

LabBest modelRankScoreBehind #1
Googlegemini-omni-1.1-flash11,516Leader
Bflflux-3-video31,49323 pts
xAIgrok-imagine-video-1.5-agent41,49224 pts
ByteDancedreamina-seedance-2.0-720p51,47937 pts
Alibaba (Qwen)wan3.061,47640 pts
MiniMaxminimax-h381,46056 pts
Metamuse-video91,45660 pts
Aorizonhappyhorse-1.0101,42789 pts

Which AI lab leads?

The lab with the most models at the top of the board is the one with the deepest bench, not only the single best model.

ByteDance holds 2 of the top 10 models (20%).

Models in the top 10 by lab

Models in the top 10 by labBar chart of how many of the top 10 models each lab has: ByteDance 2, Google 2, Alibaba (Qwen) 1, Aorizon 1, Bfl 1, Meta 1, MiniMax 1, xAI 1.ByteDance2Google2Alibaba (Qwen)1Aorizon1Bfl1Meta1MiniMax1xAI1
Show data table
LabTop 10
ByteDance2
Google2
Alibaba (Qwen)1
Aorizon1
Bfl1
Meta1
MiniMax1
xAI1

Open vs proprietary: how big is the gap?

The best open-weight model is minimax-h3 by MiniMax at 1,460, 56 points behind the best proprietary model, gemini-omni-1.1-flash by Google at 1,516. Their 95% confidence intervals do not overlap, so the gap is statistically meaningful.

7 proprietary models rank above the best open-weight model, and 1 of the top 20 is open-weight.

Open-weight here means any license other than Proprietary, including licenses with usage limits. It is a broader definition than the OSI one.

Other leaderboards

LMArena runs separate arenas for different jobs. The best model for one is often not the best for another.

Other arenas

Text arena by category

Text arena by language

How to read this leaderboard

The text-to-video arena compares clips generated from the same prompt and asks people to pick the better one. These are video models, ranked by the same blind-vote method.

Scores come from blind votes
LMArena shows a person two anonymous answers to the same prompt and asks which is better. Those head-to-head votes are fitted with a Bradley-Terry model, the statistical successor to Elo, to give each model one arena score. On the Elo scale LMArena uses, a 100-point lead means the higher model is expected to win about 64% of matchups.
Confidence intervals decide ties
Every score carries a 95% confidence interval. When two intervals overlap, the order of those two models is not settled. LMArena's rank column already accounts for this, which is why more than one model can hold the same rank.
Why it differs from usage share
A high rank does not mean many people use a model. Usage depends on price, distribution and habit. For adoption rather than quality, see AI market share.

Methodology and source

All rankings are read from the LMArena leaderboard dataset on Hugging Face, published by LMArena (formerly Chatbot Arena) under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Credit for the underlying votes, scores and confidence intervals belongs to LMArena. Essentras is not affiliated with LMArena.

This page reads the text_to_video subset, category overall, from the dataset's latest split. Scores, intervals, ranks, vote counts and license labels are shown as published. Essentras adds the grouping by lab and the derived figures on this page: gaps, lab shares, open vs proprietary and, on the main page, the history of who held #1.

Data refreshes automatically every 2 days. If the source cannot be reached, the page falls back to the last saved copy and says so at the top. Models are never merged or renamed; model and lab names appear exactly as LMArena publishes them.

Open-weight means any license other than Proprietary. History is limited to what the dataset records: the style-controlled text leaderboard from August 28, 2024. We do not scrape any other ranking site.

Track how AI models rank and describe your brand with our AI SEO service. Want these models to name your brand? Read our guide to LLM SEO.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI model for text-to-video generation?

As of September 22, 2026, gemini-omni-1.1-flash by Google ranks first on LMArena's text-to-video leaderboard with a score of 1,516. Rankings move as models and votes are added, so check the table above for the current order.

Which AI lab leads for text-to-video generation?

ByteDance holds 2 of the top 10 models (20%), ahead of Google (2), Alibaba (Qwen) (1), and Aorizon (1).

Is the best open-source model close to the best proprietary model?

The best open-weight model is minimax-h3 by MiniMax at 1,460, 56 points behind the best proprietary model, gemini-omni-1.1-flash by Google at 1,516. 7 proprietary models rank above the best open-weight model, and 1 of the top 20 is open-weight. Their 95% confidence intervals do not overlap, so the gap is statistically meaningful. "Open" here means any license other than Proprietary, which is broader than the OSI definition.

What does this leaderboard measure?

The text-to-video arena compares clips generated from the same prompt and asks people to pick the better one. These are video models, ranked by the same blind-vote method.

How often does this leaderboard update?

This page re-reads LMArena's dataset every 2 days. LMArena publishes a new snapshot when it has gathered enough votes or added models, so the date at the top shows the latest published data.

Models rank themselves. What do they say about you?

A leaderboard shows which AI models are strongest. It does not show what those models tell your customers about your company. Run the free check and see the answers.