Live ranking, refreshed every 2 days

Best AI Models for Expert-Level Prompts

As of October 8, 2026, the top-ranked model on LMArena's text leaderboard, expert category is claude-fable-5-high by Anthropic with a score of 1,550, 3 points ahead of claude-opus-4-6-high by Anthropic.

Updated October 13, 2026. Showing the last saved copy of the leaderboard, dated October 8, 2026, because the live source could not be reached.

Ranking: top 10 models

Scores come from blind head-to-head votes on LMArena's text leaderboard, expert category. Rank is LMArena's published rank, which accounts for confidence intervals, so several models can share a rank. The top 10 are shown below, and ranks 11 to 40 follow in the expandable list.

Models ranked by arena score
RankModelLabScoreVotesLicense
1claude-fable-5-highAnthropic1,550 ±94,468Proprietary
2claude-opus-4-6-highAnthropic1,547 ±87,238Proprietary
3claude-sonnet-5.5-xhighAnthropic1,546 ±26512Proprietary
4gemini-4-argon-highGoogle1,543 ±26519Proprietary
5claude-opus-5-highAnthropic1,541 ±87,060Proprietary
6claude-opus-5.5-highAnthropic1,536 ±23712Proprietary
7claude-opus-4-7Anthropic1,534 ±87,121Proprietary
8gpt-6.1-sol-maxOpenAI1,534 ±28390Proprietary
9claude-opus-4-7-highAnthropic1,534 ±86,922Proprietary
10claude-opus-4-6Anthropic1,534 ±78,663Proprietary
Show ranks 11 to 40
Rank Model                              Lab             Score         License
11   kimi-k3-max                        Moonshot AI     1,533 ±12     Open weights
12   gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh                  OpenAI          1,533 ±10     Proprietary
13   mimo-v2.6-pro                      Xiaomi          1,531 ±27     Open weights
14   claude-opus-5-max                  Anthropic       1,530 ±11     Proprietary
15   muse-spark-1.3-max                 Meta            1,528 ±15     Proprietary
16   claude-opus-4-8-high               Anthropic       1,526 ±8      Proprietary
17   gemini-3.8-flash-high              Google          1,523 ±10     Proprietary
18   claude-fable-5.1-max               Anthropic       1,522 ±18     Proprietary
19   deepseek-v4.1-flash-max            DeepSeek        1,520 ±17     Open weights
20   glm-5.3-max                        Z.ai (Zhipu)    1,520 ±14     Open weights
21   claude-opus-4-8                    Anthropic       1,515 ±8      Proprietary
22   gpt-5.4-high                       OpenAI          1,515 ±8      Proprietary
23   qwen3.8-max                        Alibaba (Qwen)  1,513 ±11     Proprietary
24   gpt-5.5-high                       OpenAI          1,513 ±8      Proprietary
25   glm-5.3-flash                      Z.ai (Zhipu)    1,511 ±12     Open weights
26   claude-sonnet-5-high               Anthropic       1,511 ±9      Proprietary
27   gemini-3.7-flash-high              Google          1,511 ±12     Proprietary
28   gpt-5.5                            OpenAI          1,510 ±8      Proprietary
29   gemini-3.1-pro-preview             Google          1,510 ±6      Proprietary
30   mimo-v2.5-pro                      Xiaomi          1,508 ±8      Open weights
31   gpt-6-astra-max                    OpenAI          1,508 ±19     Proprietary
32   qwen3.7-max-preview                Alibaba (Qwen)  1,507 ±31     Proprietary
33   claude-sonnet-4-6                  Anthropic       1,506 ±8      Proprietary
34   gpt-5.6-terra-xhigh                OpenAI          1,504 ±9      Proprietary
35   claude-opus-4-5-20251101-high-32k  Anthropic       1,503 ±12     Proprietary
36   muse-spark-1.1                     Meta            1,503 ±9      Proprietary
37   kimi-k2.6                          Moonshot AI     1,503 ±10     Open weights
38   claude-opus-4-5-20251101           Anthropic       1,503 ±8      Proprietary
39   glm-5.2-max                        Z.ai (Zhipu)    1,502 ±9      Open weights
40   qwen3.6-max-preview                Alibaba (Qwen)  1,500 ±25     Proprietary

Showing the top 40 of 364 models on this leaderboard. Data from October 8, 2026.

Best model by lab

Each lab's highest-ranked model on this leaderboard, and how far it sits from the top.

LabBest modelRankScoreBehind #1
Anthropicclaude-fable-5-high11,550Leader
Googlegemini-4-argon-high41,5437 pts
OpenAIgpt-6.1-sol-max81,53416 pts
Moonshot AIkimi-k3-max111,53317 pts
Xiaomimimo-v2.6-pro131,53119 pts
Metamuse-spark-1.3-max151,52822 pts
DeepSeekdeepseek-v4.1-flash-max191,52030 pts
Z.ai (Zhipu)glm-5.3-max201,52030 pts

Which AI lab leads?

The lab with the most models at the top of the board is the one with the deepest bench, not only the single best model.

Anthropic holds 8 of the top 10 models (80%).

Models in the top 10 by lab

Models in the top 10 by labBar chart of how many of the top 10 models each lab has: Anthropic 8, Google 1, OpenAI 1.Anthropic8Google1OpenAI1
Show data table
LabTop 10
Anthropic8
Google1
OpenAI1

Open vs proprietary: how big is the gap?

The best open-weight model is kimi-k3-max by Moonshot AI at 1,533, 17 points behind the best proprietary model, claude-fable-5-high by Anthropic at 1,550. Their 95% confidence intervals overlap, so the data cannot separate them.

10 proprietary models rank above the best open-weight model, and 4 of the top 20 are open-weight.

Open-weight here means any license other than Proprietary, including licenses with usage limits. It is a broader definition than the OSI one.

Other leaderboards

LMArena runs separate arenas for different jobs. The best model for one is often not the best for another.

Other arenas

Text arena by category

Text arena by language

How to read this leaderboard

This category keeps prompts written by people with domain expertise, which tend to be longer and more specific than everyday queries.

Scores come from blind votes
LMArena shows a person two anonymous answers to the same prompt and asks which is better. Those head-to-head votes are fitted with a Bradley-Terry model, the statistical successor to Elo, to give each model one arena score. On the Elo scale LMArena uses, a 100-point lead means the higher model is expected to win about 64% of matchups.
Confidence intervals decide ties
Every score carries a 95% confidence interval. When two intervals overlap, the order of those two models is not settled. LMArena's rank column already accounts for this, which is why more than one model can hold the same rank.
Why it differs from usage share
A high rank does not mean many people use a model. Usage depends on price, distribution and habit. For adoption rather than quality, see AI market share.

Methodology and source

All rankings are read from the LMArena leaderboard dataset on Hugging Face, published by LMArena (formerly Chatbot Arena) under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Credit for the underlying votes, scores and confidence intervals belongs to LMArena. Essentras is not affiliated with LMArena.

This page reads the text_style_control subset, category expert, from the dataset's latest split. Scores, intervals, ranks, vote counts and license labels are shown as published. Essentras adds the grouping by lab and the derived figures on this page: gaps, lab shares, open vs proprietary and, on the main page, the history of who held #1.

Data refreshes automatically every 2 days. If the source cannot be reached, the page falls back to the last saved copy and says so at the top. Models are never merged or renamed; model and lab names appear exactly as LMArena publishes them.

Open-weight means any license other than Proprietary. History is limited to what the dataset records: the style-controlled text leaderboard from August 28, 2024. We do not scrape any other ranking site.

Track how AI models rank and describe your brand with our AI SEO service. Want these models to name your brand? Read our guide to LLM SEO.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI model for expert-level prompts?

As of October 8, 2026, claude-fable-5-high by Anthropic ranks first on LMArena's text leaderboard, expert category with a score of 1,550. Rankings move as models and votes are added, so check the table above for the current order.

Which AI lab leads for expert-level prompts?

Anthropic holds 8 of the top 10 models (80%), ahead of Google (1) and OpenAI (1).

Is the best open-source model close to the best proprietary model?

The best open-weight model is kimi-k3-max by Moonshot AI at 1,533, 17 points behind the best proprietary model, claude-fable-5-high by Anthropic at 1,550. 10 proprietary models rank above the best open-weight model, and 4 of the top 20 are open-weight. Their 95% confidence intervals overlap, so the data cannot separate them. "Open" here means any license other than Proprietary, which is broader than the OSI definition.

What does this leaderboard measure?

This category keeps prompts written by people with domain expertise, which tend to be longer and more specific than everyday queries.

How often does this leaderboard update?

This page re-reads LMArena's dataset every 2 days. LMArena publishes a new snapshot when it has gathered enough votes or added models, so the date at the top shows the latest published data.

Models rank themselves. What do they say about you?

A leaderboard shows which AI models are strongest. It does not show what those models tell your customers about your company. Run the free check and see the answers.